Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: SUMMIT POINT RACEWAY ASSOCIATES, INC.

Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of SUMMIT POINT RACEWAY ASSOCIATES, INC. in 201 MOTORSPORTS PARK CIRCLE, SUMMIT POINT, WV 25446 (NAICS 611692). OSHA activity number 339801888.

Watch Summit Point Raceway Associates, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Summit Point Raceway Associates, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
201 MOTORSPORTS PARK CIRCLE
City
SUMMIT POINT
State
WV
ZIP
25446
Mailing
PO BOX 190, SUMMIT POINT, WV 25446
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
611692
Employees
200
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $3100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    (a) Summit Point Raceway:  A written exposure control plan that addressed all required elements of the standard was not developed and implemented for employees, such as EMS personnel, that have occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens as determined on June 12, 2014.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3100
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3600.00 · Current $1800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)), on all open sides:    (a)  Vehicle Maintenance Building:  The left side mezzanine in the parts department had chains used in lieu of fixed guard rails where material was hoisted and the chains were not at the minimum allowed height to protect employees from falling approximately nine feet in that the middle of the top chain sagged down to twenty-nine inches and the mid chain sagged in the middle down to eighteen inches as observed on June 11, 2013.    (b)  Vehicle Maintenance Building:  The right side mezzanine in the parts department had chains used in lieu of fixed guard rails where material was hoisted and the chains were not at the minimum allowed height to protect employees from falling approximately nine feet in that the middle of the top chain sagged down to twenty-nine inches and the mid chain sagged in the middle down to fifteen inches as observed on June 11, 2013.    (c)  Track Maintenance Building:  The mezzanine had chains used in lieu of fixed guard rails where material was hoisted and the chains were not at the minimum allowed height to protect employees from falling approximately nine feet in that the middle of the top chain sagged down to thirty-one inches and the mid chain sagged in the middle down to eighteen inches as observed on June 11, 2013.    ABATEMENT VERIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $3100.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a noise monitoring program:    (a)  The employer had not conducted noise monitoring at this location to determine which employees should be in a hearing conservation program.  An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 94.8 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 456 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 90.6 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 24 minutes not sampled.    (b)  The employer had not conducted noise monitoring at this location to determine which employees should be in a hearing conservation program.  An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 108.7 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 271 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 89.6 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 209 minutes not sampled.    ABATEMENT VERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3100
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:    (a)  The employer had not established an audiometric testing program at this location.  An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 94.8 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 456 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 90.6 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 24 minutes not sampled.    (b)  The employer had not established an audiometric testing program at this location.  An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 108.7 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 271 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 89.6 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 209 minutes not sampled.    ABATEMENT VERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 I03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(i)(3): Employees were not given the opportunity to select their hearing protectors from a variety of suitable hearing protectors provided by the employer:  (a)  The employer only offered one type of hearing protection to track maintenance employees.  An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 94.8 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 456 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 90.6 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 24 minutes not sampled.  (b)  The employer only offered one type of hearing protection to track maintenance employees.  An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 108.7 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 271 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 89.6 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 209 minutes not sampled.  ABATEMENT VERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k):    (a)  The employer did not institute a training program on noise to cover the elements required under 29 CFR 1910.95(k).  An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 94.8 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 456 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 90.6 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 24 minutes not sampled.    (b)  The employer did not institute a training program on noise to cover the elements required under 29 CFR 1910.95(k).  An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 108.7 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 271 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014.  For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 89.6 dBA.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 209 minutes not sampled.    ABATEMENT VERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.39 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a): The employer did not orally report the death of an employee or the in-patient hospitalization of three or more employees because of a work-related incident:    (a)  Summit Point Raceway, Summit Point, WV:  On or about June 7, 2014 the employer failed to report the fatality of a part time driving instructor that suffered fatal injuries during a driving accident while riding with a student driver during the Hyperfest event.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2000
  • — Z (O) $4500

View SUMMIT POINT RACEWAY ASSOCIATES, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

UNKNOWN

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339801888.