SUMMIT POINT, WV —
OSHA Inspection: SUMMIT POINT RACEWAY ASSOCIATES, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of SUMMIT POINT RACEWAY ASSOCIATES, INC. in 201 MOTORSPORTS PARK CIRCLE, SUMMIT POINT, WV 25446 (NAICS 611692). OSHA activity number 339801888.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUMMIT POINT RACEWAY ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Site address
- 201 MOTORSPORTS PARK CIRCLE
- City
- SUMMIT POINT
- State
- WV
- ZIP
- 25446
- Mailing
- PO BOX 190, SUMMIT POINT, WV 25446
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 611692
- Employees
- 200
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4500.00 · Current $3100.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: (a) Summit Point Raceway: A written exposure control plan that addressed all required elements of the standard was not developed and implemented for employees, such as EMS personnel, that have occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens as determined on June 12, 2014. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3100
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3600.00 · Current $1800.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)), on all open sides: (a) Vehicle Maintenance Building: The left side mezzanine in the parts department had chains used in lieu of fixed guard rails where material was hoisted and the chains were not at the minimum allowed height to protect employees from falling approximately nine feet in that the middle of the top chain sagged down to twenty-nine inches and the mid chain sagged in the middle down to eighteen inches as observed on June 11, 2013. (b) Vehicle Maintenance Building: The right side mezzanine in the parts department had chains used in lieu of fixed guard rails where material was hoisted and the chains were not at the minimum allowed height to protect employees from falling approximately nine feet in that the middle of the top chain sagged down to twenty-nine inches and the mid chain sagged in the middle down to fifteen inches as observed on June 11, 2013. (c) Track Maintenance Building: The mezzanine had chains used in lieu of fixed guard rails where material was hoisted and the chains were not at the minimum allowed height to protect employees from falling approximately nine feet in that the middle of the top chain sagged down to thirty-one inches and the mid chain sagged in the middle down to eighteen inches as observed on June 11, 2013. ABATEMENT VERIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1800
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4500.00 · Current $3100.00 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a noise monitoring program: (a) The employer had not conducted noise monitoring at this location to determine which employees should be in a hearing conservation program. An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 94.8 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 456 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 90.6 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 24 minutes not sampled. (b) The employer had not conducted noise monitoring at this location to determine which employees should be in a hearing conservation program. An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 108.7 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 271 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 89.6 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 209 minutes not sampled. ABATEMENT VERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3100
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: (a) The employer had not established an audiometric testing program at this location. An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 94.8 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 456 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 90.6 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 24 minutes not sampled. (b) The employer had not established an audiometric testing program at this location. An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 108.7 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 271 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 89.6 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 209 minutes not sampled. ABATEMENT VERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 I03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(3): Employees were not given the opportunity to select their hearing protectors from a variety of suitable hearing protectors provided by the employer: (a) The employer only offered one type of hearing protection to track maintenance employees. An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 94.8 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 456 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 90.6 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 24 minutes not sampled. (b) The employer only offered one type of hearing protection to track maintenance employees. An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 108.7 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 271 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 89.6 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 209 minutes not sampled. ABATEMENT VERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k): (a) The employer did not institute a training program on noise to cover the elements required under 29 CFR 1910.95(k). An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 94.8 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 456 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 90.6 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 24 minutes not sampled. (b) The employer did not institute a training program on noise to cover the elements required under 29 CFR 1910.95(k). An employee (Track Maintenance) was exposed to continuous noise at 108.7 % of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 271 minute sampling period on July 16, 2014. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure would be equivalent to an average sound level of 89.6 dBA. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 209 minutes not sampled. ABATEMENT VERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.39 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4500.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a): The employer did not orally report the death of an employee or the in-patient hospitalization of three or more employees because of a work-related incident: (a) Summit Point Raceway, Summit Point, WV: On or about June 7, 2014 the employer failed to report the fatality of a part time driving instructor that suffered fatal injuries during a driving accident while riding with a student driver during the Hyperfest event. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2000
- — Z (O) $4500
More inspections at SUMMIT POINT RACEWAY ASSOCIATES, INC.
SUMMIT POINT, WV—2015-02-11 00:00:00
SUMMIT POINT RACEWAY ASSOCIATES, INC.
SUMMIT POINT, WV—2007-03-07 00:00:00
SUMMIT POINT RACEWAY ASSOCIATES, INC.
View SUMMIT POINT RACEWAY ASSOCIATES, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 611692)
LACEY, WA—2026-07-13 00:00:00
WA317992046 - OLYMPIC DRIVING SCHOOL LLC
SEATTLE, WA—2026-01-29 00:00:00
WA317989605 - CHEETAH FLIPS LLC
NEWPORT, OR—2024-05-14 00:00:00
317736468 - KATHY ANN CONRADY
CHICAGO, IL—2023-08-23 00:00:00
RIDE CHICAGO RIDING SITE
BAKERSFIELD, CA—2023-02-17 00:00:00
JOST FLOOR COMPANY
More inspections in WV
CHARLESTON, WV—2026-07-15 00:00:00
ASTECH CORPORATION
PARKERSBURG, WV—2026-07-15 00:00:00
UNKNOWN
VIENNA, WV—2026-07-15 00:00:00
PHOENIX ASSOCIATES, INC.
BRIDGEPORT, WV—2026-07-14 00:00:00
MID ATLANTIC METALWORKS INC.
BRIDGEPORT, WV—2026-07-14 00:00:00
INFINITY ELECTRIC & SERVICE COMPANY, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339801888.