CHESHIRE, CT —
OSHA Inspection: KURTZ FARM, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KURTZ FARM, LLC in 1604 PECK LANE, CHESHIRE, CT 06410 (NAICS 111998). OSHA activity number 339803884.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KURTZ FARM, LLC
- Site address
- 1604 PECK LANE
- City
- CHESHIRE
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06410
- Mailing
- 1604 PECK LANE, CHESHIRE, CT 06410
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 111998
- Employees
- 135
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,490 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition. ESTABLISHMENT: The employees required to check in and out of the Clock House were exposed to unsanitary conditions where debris, such as (but not limited to) old piece of insulation, food crumbs, empty used juice, water, and soda containers were scattered on the floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1490
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,980 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): ESTABLISHMENT: The employer had not conducted the Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine the necessity and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1980
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: ESTABLISHMENT: The employees, required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) were not trained in the Workplace Hazard Assessment pertaining to the use and maintenance of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes. ESTABLISHMENT: The employees, handling gasoline or diesel fuel dispensers were not provided with protective gloves.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,490 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not develop and implement a written Hazard Communication program where employees were required to work with and handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) gasoline and diesel fuel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1490
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not maintain Material Safety Data sheets for chemicals, such as (but not limited to) gasoline and diesel fuel which employees were required to use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not provide information and training on Hazard Communication program to employees who were required to work with and handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) gasoline and diesel fuel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $490 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): The OSHA 300 log of work-related injuries and illnesses were not completed in detail. ESTABLISHMENT: The OSHA 300 log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses for 2014 was not created as required by this standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $490
- — Z (O) $900
1904.32 A02
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $490 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(2): At the end of each calendar year an annual summary of injuries and illnesses recorded on the OSHA 300 log was not completed in detail. ESTABLISHMENT: The OSHA 300A Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses for 2013 was not created as required by this standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $490
- — Z (O) $900
More inspections at Kurtz Farm, LLC
View Kurtz Farm, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 111998)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339803884.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.