Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: FERRARA CANDY COMPANY

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of FERRARA CANDY COMPANY in 7301 HARRISON ST., FOREST PARK, IL 60130 (NAICS 311340). OSHA activity number 339805590.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ferrara Candy Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ferrara Candy Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7301 HARRISON ST.
City
FOREST PARK
State
IL
ZIP
60130
Mailing
7301 HARRISON ST., FOREST PARK, IL 60130
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311340
Employees
500
Ownership type
Private (A)

2 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 12 instances 250 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2014
Abate by
Jan 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances M110

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to dust deflagration, explosion, or other fire hazards as the result of working at or near dust collection systems handling combustible starch and other agricultural materials which were not designed/installed/located to prevent or minimize exposure in the event of an internal equipment deflagration:   Ferrara Candy Company:  Employees were exposed to combustible dust deflagration hazards associated with dust collection systems and dryers that contained deflagration venting that discharged directly inside the employee occupied facility such as, but not limited to the following:  a) Indoor fabric media dust collector, Sly Inc., associated with Mogul 1 & 2 batch tanks in the kitchen and used to collect starch and sugar.    b) Indoor fabric media dust collector, W.W. Sly Mfg., Co. Pactecon, associated with the Mogul 1 starch buck and used to collect starch.    c) Indoor fabric media dust collector, W.W. Sly Mfg., Co. Pactecon, associated with the Mogul 1 laser cleaner and used to collect starch.    d) Indoor fabric media dust collectors, on the NID Triple Deck Vortex Dryer & Cooler associated with Mogul 2 and used to collect and return starch to the dryer and cooler.    e) Indoor fabric media dust collector, NID associated with Mogul 2 and used to collect starch from the starch buck and sander and return it to the dryer and cooler.   f) Indoor fabric media dust collectors, on the NID Triple Deck Vortex Dryer & Cooler associated with Mogul 3 and used to collect and return starch to the dryer and cooler.    g) Indoor fabric media dust collector, NID associated with Mogul 3 and used to collect starch from the starch buck and sander and return it to the dryer and cooler.   h) Indoor fabric media dust collectors, on the NID Triple Deck Vortex Dryer & Cooler associated with Mogul 4 and used to collect and return starch to the dryer and cooler.   i) Indoor fabric media dust collector, NID associated with Mogul 4 and used to collect starch from the starch buck and sander and return it to the dryer and cooler.    Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means of abatement include following the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard, 61 Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities, 2013 ed.  Sections 6.1, 6.3.3, 6.3.3.1, 8.4.4.1, 10.4.3 and NFPA Standard 68 Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting, 2013 ed. - Sections 4.2.1.3, 6.6.1, 6.6.2 and A.6.6.   Specifically, for all equipment containing deflagration venting discharging into indoor locations: Provide deflagration venting that discharges to a safe, outdoor location or discharges indoors in a recognized safe manner.  NFPA 68 Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting provides specific guidance on the safe venting of deflagrations on  indoor enclosed process equipment. Deflagrations may be safely discharged to outdoor locations through relief ducting provided that consideration is given to the reduction in deflagration venting efficiency caused by the ducts, that the ducting is restricted to no more than 20 feet, and the ducting is able to withstand the maximum pressure developed in the vented enclosure (Pred). If deflagration venting through relief ducting is not feasible due to the proximity of the indoor vented enclosure to an outdoor wall, deflagration venting through a listed dust retention and flame-arresting device may be a suitable alternative.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.95 C01

Other-than-serious 7 instances 40 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2014
Abate by
Jan 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:     Ferrara Candy Company did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program when employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 decibels or an adjusted action level for an extended shift:      1) A temporary employee working as a cook in the kitchen on the fifth floor was exposed to noise at 56.07% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 90 dBA. The equivalent dBA levels of 56.07% is approximately 85.8 dBA which exceeds the adjusted action level of 82.1 dBA. Sampling was performed on November 5, 2014 during one 12-hour shift for 444 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 276 minutes.      2) A temporary employee doing scrap packaging was exposed to noise at 57.5% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 90 dBA. The equivalent dBA level of 57.5% is approximately 86 dBA which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. Sampling was performed on November 5, 2014 during one 10-hour shift for 480 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 120 minutes.     3) A temporary employee working as a dumper in fruit snacks was exposed to noise at 82.4% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 90 dBA. This is equivalent dBA level of 82.4% is approximately 88.6 dBA which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. Sampling was performed on November 5, 2014 during one 10-hour shift for 478 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 122 minutes.     4) A temporary employee working as a dumper in fruit snacks was exposed to noise at 94.0% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 90 dBA. The equivalent dBA level of 94.0% is approximately 89.5 dBA which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. Sampling was performed on November 5, 2014 during one 10-hour shift for 480 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 120 minutes.      5) A temporary employee doing engrossing and polishing in the chocolate panning room was exposed to noise at 127.3% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 90 dBA. The equivalent dBA level of 127.3% is approximately 91.7 dBA which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. Sampling was performed on November 5, 2014 during one 10-hour shift for 408 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 192 minutes.      6) A temporary employee doing polishing in the sugar panning room was exposed to noise at 167.6% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 90 dBA. The equivalent dBA level of 167.6% is approximately 93.7 dBA which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. Sampling was performed on November 5, 2014 during one 10-hour shift for 466 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 134 minutes.      7) A temporary employee doing polishing in the sugar panning room was exposed to noise at 328.9% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 90 dBA. The equivalent dBA level of 328.9% is approximately 98.5 dBA which exceeds the adjusted action level of 82.1 dBA. Sampling was performed on November 5, 2014 during one 12-hour shift for 464 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 256 minutes.      In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $3500
  • · C (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $7000

View Ferrara Candy Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339805590.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.