Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: D.D.M. DIRECT LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of D.D.M. DIRECT LLC in 190 MILLIKEN DRIVE, HEBRON, OH 43025 (NAICS 511140). OSHA activity number 339808800.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch D.D.M. Direct LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for D.D.M. Direct LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
D.D.M. DIRECT LLC
Site address
190 MILLIKEN DRIVE
City
HEBRON
State
OH
ZIP
43025
Mailing
P O BOX 1984, BUFFALO, NY 14240
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
511140
Employees
82
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 82 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2014
Abate by
Jul 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $2,142 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.  a.  At the work site, employees used a Flow Master insertion station (#2) to collate and insert up to seven printed items in a mailing envelope, which was then dampened and sealed as it left the machine.  The employer had failed to guard the inserter at the point of operation in that magnetic interlocks on the Plexiglas guard were missing, allowing the inserter to continue to operate when the guard was opened and exposing the employee to moving parts.  b.  At the work site, employees used a Flow Master insertion station (#4) to collate and insert up to seven printed items in a mailing envelope, which was then dampened and sealed as it left the machine.  The employer had failed to guard the inserter at the point of operation in that magnetic interlocks on the Plexiglas guard were missing, allowing the inserter to continue to operate when the guard was opened and exposing the employee to moving parts.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2142
  • · Z (S) $3060

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339808800.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.