OSHA Inspection: SCI FUNERAL SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC.

Issued

2014-08-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-09-19 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4250.00 · Current $2550.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually:  a. On or about July 1, 2014, the employer did not conduct an annual review of the Exposure Control Plan.

Issued

2014-08-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-09-19 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan, did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control plan:  a.  On or about July 1, 2014, the employer did not solicit input from employees who were potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps on the identification, evaluation, and selection of effective engineering controls.

Issued

2014-08-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4250.00 · Current $2550.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employees exposure:  a.  On or about June 16, 2014, engineering controls such as, but not limited to, surgical blades with engineering protection were not used to guard against employee exposure to blades potentially contaminated with bloodborne pathogens when cutting the skin to gain access to arties and veins.

Issued

2014-08-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-09-19 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1290

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee wore the respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about June 16, 2014, an employee who voluntarily wore a full-face negative pressure respirator had not been provided with a medical evaluation prior to wearing the respirator.