EXETER, PA —
OSHA Inspection: BOB LASOTA CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BOB LASOTA CONSTRUCTION in 875 EXETER AVENUE, EXETER, PA 18643 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339810582.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BOB LASOTA CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 875 EXETER AVENUE
- City
- EXETER
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18643
- Mailing
- 400 MCCLEAN STREET, AVOCA, PA 18641
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means. a) Northeast corner of the residence, 875 Exeter Avenue, Exeter, PA - Employees mounted and dismounted onto the T-Shaped Main Roof from a Louisville L-3022 32 FT Type IA Fiberglass D-Rung extension ladder that was located within three-foot (3') of the live electric power supply line (240 V) for the residence. Employees were exposed to contact with an electrical current hazard, as observed on or about June 17, 2014. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. a) Garage Roof, 875 Exeter Avenue, Exeter, PA - Employees engaged in repairing and shingling the low sloped garage roof (3:12 pitch) of a residence were exposed to a fall hazard that ranged from twelve-foot, eleven-inches (12'11") to eight-foot, four-inches (8'4") above ground level. The employer did not ensure that fall protection systems were utilized to protect the employees from falling, as observed on or about June 17, 2014. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):. a) T-Shaped Main Roof, 875 Exeter Avenue, Exeter, PA - Employees engaged in repairing and shingling the steep sloped main roof (6:12 pitch) of a residence were exposed to a fall hazard that ranged from twenty eight-foot, five-inches (28'5") to twenty two-foot, seven-inches (22'7") above ground level. The employer did not ensure that fall protection systems were utilized to protect the employees from falling, as observed on or about June 17, 2014. b) Front Porch Roof, 875 Exeter Avenue, Exeter, PA - Employees engaged in repairing and shingling the low sloped front porch roof (2:12 pitch) of a residence were exposed to a fall hazard that ranged from fourteen-foot, two-inches (14'2") to twelve-foot, three-inches (12'3") above ground level. The employer did not ensure that fall protection systems were utilized to protect the employees from falling, as observed on or about June 18, 2014.In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. a) Northeast corner of the residence, 875 Exeter Avenue, Exeter, PA - Employees mounted and dismounted onto a roof from a Louisville L-3022 32 Ft Type IA Fiberglass D-Rung extension ladder whose side rails extended approximately eighteen-inches (18") above the main roof eave and which was not secured to the upper landing surface. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard of twenty-two-foot, seven-inches (22'7"), as observed on or about June 17, 2014. b) Southeast corner of the front porch, 875 Exeter Avenue, Exeter, PA - Employees mounted and dismounted onto a roof from a Werner D1120-2 20 Ft Type III Aluminum D-Rung extension ladder whose side rails extended approximately eighteen-inches (18") above the front porch roof eave and which was not secured to the upper landing surface. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard of twelve-foot, three-inches (12'3"), on or about June 17, 2014. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed. a) Dormer, Northeast edge of the main roof, 875 Exeter Avenue, Exeter, PA, 875 Exeter Avenue, Exeter, PA - Employees dismounted from the steep sloped dormer roof while using a Tie Down Engineering Tranzsporter LH 2000 Platform Hoist aluminum ladder that was not designed/intended for use as a personnel ladder. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard of twenty five-foot, two-inches (25'2"), as observed on or about June 17, 2014. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B16
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired. a) Dormer, Northeast edge of the main roof, 875 Exeter Avenue, Exeter, PA - Employees operated and climbed a Tie Down Engineering Tranzsporter LH 2000 Platform Hoist aluminum ladder with a missing fastener, unsecured fastener, and a broken rung. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard of twenty five-foot, two-inches (25'2") and a struck-by hazard, as observed on or about June 17, 2014. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at BOB Lasota Construction
View BOB Lasota Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339810582.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.