Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: GMQ GENERAL CONTRACTORS, CORP.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GMQ GENERAL CONTRACTORS, CORP. in 1019 ESPLANADE AVE, PELHAM, NY 10803 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339814717.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch GMQ General Contractors, Corp. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for GMQ General Contractors, Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1019 ESPLANADE AVE
City
PELHAM
State
NY
ZIP
10803
Mailing
32 CLINTON STREET, APT 2, SLEEPY HOLLOW, NY 10591
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    On or about 6/19/2014, Esplanade Ave.    a) Employees exposed to various hazards at the worksite were not provided safety awareness training as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employee working in area where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, was not protected by protective helmets:    a) The employee was not wearing a hard hat while cleaning up debris around the base of the dumpster.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $720
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    On or about 6/19/2014, Esplanade Ave.    a) The employees worked on the steep part of the roof and were not protected from an approximate 25' fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.852 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.852(a): Material was dropped to points lying outside the exterior walls of the structure and the area was not effectively protected:    On or about 6/19/2014, Esplanade Ave    a) The employees used a make-shift chute for the roofing debris. It was not properly barricaded to prevent injuries to the employee below.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access; or, when such an extension was not possible because of the ladder's length, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:    On or about 6/19/2014, Esplanade Ave.    a) The 26' extension ladder was not secured at the top and the side rails did not extend 3' above the landing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339814717.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.