PELHAM, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: GMQ GENERAL CONTRACTORS, CORP.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GMQ GENERAL CONTRACTORS, CORP. in 1019 ESPLANADE AVE, PELHAM, NY 10803 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339814717.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GMQ GENERAL CONTRACTORS, CORP.
- Site address
- 1019 ESPLANADE AVE
- City
- PELHAM
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10803
- Mailing
- 32 CLINTON STREET, APT 2, SLEEPY HOLLOW, NY 10591
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: On or about 6/19/2014, Esplanade Ave. a) Employees exposed to various hazards at the worksite were not provided safety awareness training as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $960
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employee working in area where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, was not protected by protective helmets: a) The employee was not wearing a hard hat while cleaning up debris around the base of the dumpster.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: On or about 6/19/2014, Esplanade Ave. a) The employees worked on the steep part of the roof and were not protected from an approximate 25' fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.852 A
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.852(a): Material was dropped to points lying outside the exterior walls of the structure and the area was not effectively protected: On or about 6/19/2014, Esplanade Ave a) The employees used a make-shift chute for the roofing debris. It was not properly barricaded to prevent injuries to the employee below.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $960
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access; or, when such an extension was not possible because of the ladder's length, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: On or about 6/19/2014, Esplanade Ave. a) The 26' extension ladder was not secured at the top and the side rails did not extend 3' above the landing.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339814717.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.