Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: AUSTEX

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AUSTEX in GREY CAMLET TRAIL, AUSTIN, TX 78748 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 339815532.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Austex for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Austex is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AUSTEX
Site address
GREY CAMLET TRAIL
City
AUSTIN
State
TX
ZIP
78748
Mailing
100 TEAL LANE, KYLE, TX 78640
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.    The employer did not ensure that frequent and regular inspections of the job site were performed where employees were constructing a residential home, exposing employees to the hazards associated with residential construction.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.405 G02 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was operating a cement mixer using an extension cord which had the insulation pulled back around the plug area exposing the conductors and causing pull to joints or terminal screws.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.416 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:  On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was operating a cement mixer using an electric extension cord which had the outer insulation worn out in several places exposing the inner insulation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was engaged in masonry work on the walls of a residential structure while working on a thirteen (13) foot scaffold without base plates or any other adequate foundation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement:  On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was engaged in masonry work on the walls of a residential structure while working on a thirteen (13) foot scaffold without adequate footing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was engaged in masonry work on the walls of a residential structure while working on a thirteen (13) foot scaffold without ladder access, and the cross braces were used for access.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01 VII

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was engaged in masonry work on the walls of a residential structure while working on a thirteen (13) foot scaffold without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was engaged in masonry work on the walls of a residential structure while working on a thirteen (13) foot scaffold that had not been erected under the supervision or guidance of a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was engaged in masonry work on the walls of a residential structure while working on a thirteen (13) foot scaffold without training on the safe use of scaffolds.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339815532.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.