AUSTIN, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: AUSTEX
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AUSTEX in GREY CAMLET TRAIL, AUSTIN, TX 78748 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 339815532.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AUSTEX
- Site address
- GREY CAMLET TRAIL
- City
- AUSTIN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78748
- Mailing
- 100 TEAL LANE, KYLE, TX 78640
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers. The employer did not ensure that frequent and regular inspections of the job site were performed where employees were constructing a residential home, exposing employees to the hazards associated with residential construction.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was operating a cement mixer using an extension cord which had the insulation pulled back around the plug area exposing the conductors and causing pull to joints or terminal screws.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used: On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was operating a cement mixer using an electric extension cord which had the outer insulation worn out in several places exposing the inner insulation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was engaged in masonry work on the walls of a residential structure while working on a thirteen (13) foot scaffold without base plates or any other adequate foundation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 C02 I
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement: On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was engaged in masonry work on the walls of a residential structure while working on a thirteen (13) foot scaffold without adequate footing.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was engaged in masonry work on the walls of a residential structure while working on a thirteen (13) foot scaffold without ladder access, and the cross braces were used for access.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was engaged in masonry work on the walls of a residential structure while working on a thirteen (13) foot scaffold without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was engaged in masonry work on the walls of a residential structure while working on a thirteen (13) foot scaffold that had not been erected under the supervision or guidance of a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. On or about June 19th, 2014, an employee was engaged in masonry work on the walls of a residential structure while working on a thirteen (13) foot scaffold without training on the safe use of scaffolds.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339815532.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.