Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: GLADIS ALI CLEANING SERVICES AND MASONRY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GLADIS ALI CLEANING SERVICES AND MASONRY, INC. in 5007 PRETTY WAY LOT 147, PANAMA CITY, FL 32405 (NAICS 423320). OSHA activity number 339817686.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gladis ALI Cleaning Services and Masonry, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gladis ALI Cleaning Services and Masonry, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5007 PRETTY WAY LOT 147
City
PANAMA CITY
State
FL
ZIP
32405
Mailing
430 PRISTINE WATER LANE, MARY ESTHER, FL 32569
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423320
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Jul 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs,  debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures:  a. On or about June 10, 2014, during the installing of brick work around the two-story wood frame home, debris was not kept clear from underneath the scaffold system and walking areas, exposing the employees to tripping hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1600
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Jul 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a. On or about June 10, 2014, the employee throwing bricks up to another employee on the second level of the scaffold system did not have on a hard hat, exposing himself to a head injury.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Jul 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):    a. On or about June 10, 2014, both working levels of the two buck high scaffold system were not fully planked, exposing employees to 13 feet fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4900
  • · Z (S) $4900

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Jul 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:    a. On or about June 10, 2014, several scaffold poles did not bear screw jacks, exposing the employees to collasping hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Jul 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:    a. On or about June 10, 2014, there was no safe means of egress, the employees climbed the scaffold rungs, exposing themselves to a 13 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4900

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Sep 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person:    a. On or about June 10, 2014, the two buck high scaffold system was erected, moved, dismantled without a competent person at the site, exposing the employees to collapsing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4900

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Jul 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:    a. On or about June 10, 2014, the two buck high scaffold system was not equipped with toe boards, exposing the employee working underneath to a head injury.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Jul 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  a. On or about June 10, 2014, employees installing brick on the exterior of a two-story home were not protected from falling 13 feet by the use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any other type fall protection method.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4900
  • · Z (S) $4900

1926.20 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Sep 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): A safety and health program was not initiated and maintained to provide compliance with the general safety and health provisions of the standard:    a. On or about June 10, 2014, the employer did not initiate and maintain a safety and health program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Sep 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    a. On or about June 10, 2014, the employer did not develop, implement and maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program for all chemicals used at the workplace such as but not limited to: Jenkins cement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339817686.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.