Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,547Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-01 Last loaded 2026-09-04

OSHA Inspection: KEVIN BARAJAS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KEVIN BARAJAS in THE CREEK AT ARTHUR HILLS SUBDIVISION, LOT #15, ACWORTH, GA 30101 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 339817728.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Kevin Barajas for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kevin Barajas is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KEVIN BARAJAS
Site address
THE CREEK AT ARTHUR HILLS SUBDIVISION, LOT #15
City
ACWORTH
State
GA
ZIP
30101
Mailing
201 NORTHWOOD DR., APT. BB4, ATLANTA, GA 30342
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.   (a) The Creek at Arthur Hills Subdivision, Lot #15, Acworth, GA; The employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards as they were not required to wear eye protection while using pneumatic nail guns to secure siding to a residential structure.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Scaffold supports and crossbracing were used as a means of access.  a) The Creek at Arthur Hills Subdivision, Lot #15, Acworth, GA; The employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 17 feet as a secure ladder was not used by employees to access the working level of the ladder jack scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.   a) The Creek at Arthur Hills Subdivision, Lot #15, Acworth, GA; The employer exposed employees to fall hazards while working approximately 17 feet above the ground from a ladder jack scaffold which did not have a complete guardrail system, due to the mid-rails, top-rails, and end-rails not being installed.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) The Creek at Arthur Hills Subdivision, Lot #15, Acworth, GA; The employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 17 feet while working from the roof of the home, installing siding materials without the use of fall protection systems.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339817728.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.