BROOKLYN, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: KINGS GLASS LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of KINGS GLASS LLC in 200 SIEGEL STREET, BROOKLYN, NY 11206 (NAICS 339999). OSHA activity number 339819948.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KINGS GLASS LLC
- Site address
- 200 SIEGEL STREET
- City
- BROOKLYN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 11206
- Mailing
- 200 SEIGEL STREET, BROOKLYN, NY 11206
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 339999
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: Location: 200 Seigel Street, Brooklyn, NY. a) A fire extinguisher had not been inspected within the last 12 months. On or about 06/23/2014.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.179 J02 IV
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,192 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed: Location: 200 Seigel Street, Brooklyn, NY. a) Monthly inspection of the hoist chains of 1 ton hoist was not conducted and records were not maintained. On or about 06/23/2014.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1192
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered Location: 200 Seigel Street, Brooklyn, NY. a) Employees were not using PPE and insulating tools while working on energized 1 ton overhead crane controller box 2 phase 220 volts. Injured employee was not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and when working on energized equipment. On or about 06/23/2014.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.136 A
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards: Location: 200 Seigel Street, Brooklyn, NY. a) Employees are exposed to foot injuries while working in the glass cutting shop without using safety protection. On or about 06/23/2014.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.333 A02
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(2): Where exposed live parts were not deenergized (i.e., for reasons of increased or additional hazards or infeasibility), other safety-related work practices were not used to protect employees who could be exposed to the electrical hazards involved: Location: 200 Seigel Street, Brooklyn, NY. a) Employees working an overhead crane electrical control box were not protected from live parts. Safety related work practices were not used to protect employees who were exposed to the electrical hazards involved when working on energized equipment. On or about 06/23/2014.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not using electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed: Location: 200 Seigel Street, Brooklyn, NY. a) Employees worked on an overhead crane controller with live exposed parts and did not use any electrical protective equipment. Injured employee was not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and when working on energized equipment. On or about 06/23/2014.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
1904.29 B03
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): Each recordable injury or illness was not entered on the OSHA 300 Log and/or an incident report (OSHA Form 301or equivalent) within seven (7) calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury or illness has occurred: Location: 200 Seigel Street, Brooklyn, NY. a) Employer did not provide the OSHA log 300, 300A summary and 301 incident report of the accident. On or about 06/23/2014.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $400
- · Z (O) $400
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (Construction Reference: 1926.59)(a) Location: 200 Seigel Street, Brooklyn, NY. a) The employer did not have a written hazard communication program for employees who used paint thinner, klean-strip denatured alcohol. On or about 06/23/2014. ABATEMENT NOTE The written program shall include descriptions of how the criteria for the following will be met: 1. Labeling and other forms of warning 2. Material Safety Data Sheets 3. Employee information and training including but not limited to the following chemicals 4. A list of hazardous chemicals known to be present in the work place 5. Methods used to inform employees of the hazards associated with the non routine tasks, and 6. Methods used to inform contractors of the work place hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) Location: 200 Seigel Street, Brooklyn, NY. a) The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for the Paint thinner, klean-strip denatured alcohol. On or about 06/23/2014. ABATEMENT NOTE The written program shall include descriptions of how the criteria for the following will be met: 1. Labeling and other forms of warning 2. Material Safety Data Sheets 3. Employee information and training including but not limited to the following chemicals 4. A list of hazardous chemicals known to be present in the work place 5. Methods used to inform employees of the hazards associated with the non routine tasks, and 6. Methods used to inform contractors of the work place hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Location: 200 Seigel Street, Brooklyn, NY. a) The employer did not have hazard communication information and training to employees who were exposed to paint thinner, klean-strip denatured alcohol. On or about 06/23/2014. ABATEMENT NOTE The written program shall include descriptions of how the criteria for the following will be met: 1. Labeling and other forms of warning 2. Material Safety Data Sheets 3. Employee information and training including but not limited to the following chemicals 4. A list of hazardous chemicals known to be present in the work place 5. Methods used to inform employees of the hazards associated with the non routine tasks, and 6. Methods used to inform contractors of the work place hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 339999)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339819948.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.