Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: REED CANDLE COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of REED CANDLE COMPANY in 1531 WEST POPLAR, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78207 (NAICS 339999). OSHA activity number 339821498.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Reed Candle Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Reed Candle Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
REED CANDLE COMPANY
Site address
1531 WEST POPLAR
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78207
Mailing
1531 WEST POPLAR, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78207
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339999
Employees
102
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2014
Abate by
Oct 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(4):Skylights were not guarded by a standard skylight screen or a fixed standard railing on all exposed sides:  Building Rooftop, Above Staging Area: On or about June 24, 2014, an employee performing maintenance and repair to rooftop skylights, which lacked fixed guardrails on exposed sides and/or skylight screens, was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 20 feet to the warehouse concrete ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2014
Abate by
Oct 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  Manufacturing, Slurry Machine: On or about June 30, 2014, and times prior there to, employee(s) who operate the "Slurry" Machine for candle manufacturing processes were exposed to continuous noise at a dose of 97.8% (8-Hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 444 minute sampling period. For a full eight hour work shift this exposure is equivalent to an average sound level of 89.8 dBA. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 36 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 53 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2014
Abate by
Oct 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten liquids, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  a) Decorating Department: On or about June 24, 2014, and times prior there to, employee(s) who use, handle, and transport chemicals, such as but not limited to, Gemini Coating Clear Gloss Lacquer (Toluene 45.84%, Xylene 6.77%, Ethyl Benzene 1.70%), CT-66/CT-1205 Color Thinner (25-35% Xylene, 20-30% Methyl Ethyl Ketone), and various Pylam Products Company Dyes, including Pylam DarK Blue LX-11452, Pylam Golden Yellow LX-10921, Pylam New Red LX-11371, were exposed to eye injury hazards and were not provided with or required to use adequate eye or face protection by the employer.  b) Manufacturing Department and Decorating Department: On June 24, 2014, and times prior there to, employees who perform manufacturing and decorating processes where glass candle jars are handled were exposed to eye injury hazards from broken glass fragments and were not provided with adequate eye protection, such as but not limited to safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2014
Abate by
Oct 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  Manufacturing Department, Southwest side: On or about June 24, 2014, and times prior there to, employee(s) who operate a candle wicking machine, labeled Wicking Machine #1, were exposed to caught-in hazards from unguarded rotating parts at the rear and at the front of the machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 14 instances 34 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2014
Abate by
Oct 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded smooth projecting shaft end(s) projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:  a) Manufacturing Department, Bundling Line: On or about June 24, 2014, and times prior there to, employee(s) who operate a custom bundling machine with an attached Hytrol Roller Conveyer system were exposed to caught-in hazards from four unguarded rotating shaft ends on the mid-left side of the Hytrol conveyer that projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft and were within 6 inches of passing employee's hands and hair.  b) Manufacturing Department, Bundling Line: On or about June 24, 2014, and times prior there to, employee(s) who operate a custom bundling machine were exposed to caught-in hazards from two unguarded rotating shaft ends on the mid-left side of the bundling machine that projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft.  c) Manufacturing Department, Filling Line, Hytrol Conveyor between Semtrak 2 and Semtrak 3: On or about June 24, 2014, employee(s) were exposed to caught-in hazards from six unguarded rotating shaft ends on the mid-right side of the Hytrol conveyer belt system that projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft and were within 6 inches of passing employee's hands and hair.  d) Manufacturing Department, Filling Line, Semtrak 1:  On or about June 24, 2014, employee(s) were exposed to caught-in hazards from two unguarded rotating shaft ends on the top and bottom left end of the Semtrak 1 conveyer system that projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.219 C04 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2014
Abate by
Oct 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,350 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(ii): The unused keyway(s) of projecting shaft end(s) were not filled up or covered:  Manufacturing Department, Filling Line, "Big Mama": On or about June 24, 2014, and times prior there to, employee(s) who operate a custom candle manufacturing machine, referred to as "Big Mama", were exposed to caught-in hazards from an unguarded keyway attached to a machine gear below the machines conveyor system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1350
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.219 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2014
Abate by
Oct 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1): Gear(s) were not guarded by a complete enclosure or by one of the methods specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(1)(iii):  Manufacturing Department, Filling Line, "Big Mama": On or about June 24, 2014, and times prior there to, employee(s) who operate a custom candle manufacturing machine, referred to as "Big Mama", were exposed to caught-in hazards from an unguarded gear with an attached and protruding keyway located in an open space below the machines conveyor system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2014
Abate by
Oct 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs 42 inches or less from the floor level were not fully enclosed by guards conforming to requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  a) Decorating Department, Middle of facility: On or about June 24, 2014, and times prior there to, employee(s) who operate a glass candle jar labeling machine, referred to as Meyers #1, were exposed to caught-in hazards from unguarded rotating belts on the labeling mechanism of the machine.  b) Decorating Department, Northwest side: On or about June 24, 2014, and times prior there to, employee(s) who operate a glass candle jar labeling machine, referred to as Meyers #3, were exposed to caught-in hazards from unguarded rotating belts on the labeling mechanism of the machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 102 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2014
Abate by
Oct 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Warehouse, all departments: On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not implement or maintain an effective written Hazard Communication Program to train and inform employee(s) who handle, use, transport or are potentially exposed to vapors from chemicals, such as but not limited to Gemini Coating Clear Gloss Lacquer (Toluene 45.84%, Xylene 6.77%, Ethyl Benzene 1.70%), CT-66/CT-1205 Color Thinner (25-35% Xylene, 20-30% Methyl Ethyl Ketone), and various Pylam Products Company Dyes, including Pylam DarK Blue LX-11452, Pylam Golden Yellow LX-10921, Pylam New Red LX-11371.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

View Reed Candle Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339821498.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.