Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS COLVILLE AGENCY, BRANCH OF ROADS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS COLVILLE AGENCY, BRANCH OF ROADS in HWY 21, BLDG. 87, KELLER, WA 99140 (NAICS 921190). OSHA activity number 339824807.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bureau of Indian Affairs Colville Agency, Branch of Roads — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bureau of Indian Affairs Colville Agency, Branch of Roads is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
HWY 21, BLDG. 87
City
KELLER
State
WA
ZIP
99140
Mailing
PO BOX 111, NESPELEM, WA 99155
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
921190
Employees
2
Ownership type
D

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(a): The employer did not establish an emergency action plan whenever an OSHA standard in this part required one and did not meet the requirements of paragraphs (a)-(f)(3) of this section:  a) Branch of Roads Shop, where employees would evacuate the building in the event of a fire, the fire extinguishers located throughout the work place were not inspected on an annual or monthly basis.   29 CFR 1910.157(a): Scope and application. The requirements of this section apply to the placement, use, maintenance, and testing of portable fire extinguishers provided for the use of employees. Paragraph (d) of this section does not apply to extinguishers provided for employee use on the outside of workplace buildings or structures. Where extinguishers are provided but are not intended for employee use and the employer has an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan that meet the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.38 and 29 CFR 1910.39 respectively, then only the requirements of paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section apply.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.39 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.39(b):The employer did not establish a fire prevention plan that was in writing, kept in the workplace, and made available to employees for review (an employer with 10 or fewer employees may communicate the plan orally to employees):  a) Branch of Roads Shop, where employees would evacuate the building in the event of a fire, the fire extinguishers located throughout the work place were not inspected on an annual or monthly basis.    29 CFR 1910.157(a): Scope and application. The requirements of this section apply to the placement, use, maintenance, and testing of portable fire extinguishers provided for the use of employees. Paragraph (d) of this section does not apply to extinguishers provided for employee use on the outside of workplace buildings or structures. Where extinguishers are provided but are not intended for employee use and the employer has an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan that meet the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.38 and 29 CFR 1910.39 respectively, then only the requirements of paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section apply.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(1):  The employer was not responsible for the inspection, maintenance and testing of all portable fire extinguishers in the workplace:  a) Branch of Roads, where fire extinguishers not inspected annually included:  1. Shop, where the Amerex fire extinguisher was equipped with an inspection tag dated October 2010.  2. Shop, where the ABC Nitrogen fire extinguisher was equipped with an inspection tag dated October 2010.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:   a) Branch of Roads, where fire extinguishers not inspected monthly included:  1. Shop, where the Amerex fire extinguisher was equipped with an inspection tag dated October 2010.  2. Shop, where the ABC Nitrogen fire extinguisher was equipped with an inspection tag dated October 2010.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machines designed for a fixed location were not anchored to prevent walking or moving:   a) Shop, where the Delta 17 drill press was not anchored in place.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    a) Shop, where the tongue guard on the Baldor pedestal grinder measured 1/2 inch from the abrasive wheel.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 G01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): Working space for equipment likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized was used for storage:   a)  Shop, where items including traffic cones and lumber were stored in front of the electrical panel located on the southeast wall.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 J01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(1)(i): Fixtures, lampholders, lamps, rosettes, and receptacles may have no live parts normally exposed to employee contact. However, rosettes and cleat-type lampholders and receptacles located at least 2.44 m (8.0 ft) above the floor may have exposed terminals:   a) Shop Restroom, where two unguarded single bulbs measured 7 feet 6 inches above floor level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:    a) Shop, where the receptacle located on the east wall was not equipped with a faceplate.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Bureau of Indian Affairs Colville Agency, Branch of Roads's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339824807.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.