Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ARLINGTON STAMPING, LLC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ARLINGTON STAMPING, LLC in 2357 W. JEFFERSON STREET, GRAND PRAIRIE, TX 75051 (NAICS 336370). OSHA activity number 339825069.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Arlington Stamping, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Arlington Stamping, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2357 W. JEFFERSON STREET
City
GRAND PRAIRIE
State
TX
ZIP
75051
Mailing
2357 W. JEFFERSON STREET, GRAND PRAIRIE, TX 75051
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336370
Employees
92
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2014
Abate by
Dec 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced

Hazardous substances C730

29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of carbon monoxide, listed in Table Z-1, in excess of the 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) concentration of 50 parts per million (ppm):    a. This violation occurred on June 24, 2014, in building A, where a press operator was exposed to carbon monoxide at an 8-hour TWA of 184.7 ppm, approximately 3.69 times the permissible exposure limit of 50 ppm.    b. This violation occurred on June 24, 2014, in building A, where a press operator was exposed to carbon monoxide at an 8-hour TWA of 150.2 ppm, approximately 3.00 times the permissible exposure limit of 50 ppm.    c. This violation occurred on June 24, 2014, in building B, where a machine operator was exposed to carbon monoxide at an 8-hour TWA of 203.2 ppm, approximately 4.06 times the permissible exposure limit of 50 ppm.    d. This violation occurred on June 24, 2014, in building B, where a machine operator was exposed to carbon monoxide at an 8-hour TWA of 171.1 ppm, approximately 3.42 times the permissible exposure limit of 50 ppm.    e. This violation occurred on June 24, 2014, in building B, where a machine operator was exposed to carbon monoxide at an 8-hour TWA of 144.1 ppm, approximately 2.88 times the permissible exposure limit of 50 ppm.    f. This violation occurred on June 24, 2014, in building B, where a machine operator was exposed to carbon monoxide at an 8-hour TWA of 151.0 ppm, approximately 3.02 times the permissible exposure limit of 50 ppm.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2450
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2014
Abate by
Dec 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances C730

29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):  This violation occurred on June 24, 2014, in buildings A and B, where the employer had not implemented feasible administrative or engineering controls to achieve compliance with the permissible exposure limit for carbon monoxide.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    This violation occurred on or about June 24, 2014, when employees working in the production buildings had not been provided with effective information and training on carbon monoxide.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339825069.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.