Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SCOTT D. BUILDERS, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SCOTT D. BUILDERS, LLC in 7489 HWY 60, HARTFORD, WI 53027 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 339825473.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Scott D. Builders, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Scott D. Builders, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7489 HWY 60
City
HARTFORD
State
WI
ZIP
53027
Mailing
W2446 LOMIRA DR., BROWNSVILLE, WI 53006
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2014
Abate by
Nov 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  (a)    The employer failed to provide the documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1, Item 1; Citation 1, Item 2; and Citation 1, Item 3 for not initiating and maintaining safety and health programs, not performing frequent and regular jobsite inspections, not providing training to people exposed to fall hazards and not providing fall protection on the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $400

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Oct 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.    (a) The employer did not ensure that a safety program was established to address construction-related hazards such as, but not limited to, struck-by hazards, fall hazards, caught-in-between hazards, and electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Oct 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):    (a) The employer did not ensure that work site inspections were conducted during the construction of a pole barn.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Oct 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection when conducting roofing work on a pole barn, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.502 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Aug 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(1): A fall protection plan was not prepared by a qualified person and developed specifically for the site where the leading edge work, precast work, or residential construction work was being performed:    (a) The employer did not ensure that a fall protection plan was established, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2014
Abate by
Oct 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:    (a) The employer did not ensure that a stairway or ladder was provided to gain access to the roof of a pole barn, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339825473.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.