TETERBORO, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: INTERFASHION COSMETICS CORP.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of INTERFASHION COSMETICS CORP. in 32 HENRY STREET, TETERBORO, NJ 07608 (NAICS 325620). OSHA activity number 339826844.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INTERFASHION COSMETICS CORP.
- Site address
- 32 HENRY STREET
- City
- TETERBORO
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07608
- Mailing
- 32 HENRY STREET, TETERBORO, NJ 07608
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325620
- Employees
- 63
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Production: Medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to wear a respirator was not provided to those who were required to wear a negative pressure respirator, on or about 06/27/14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Production: Production employees handle hazardous flammable chemicals such as, but not limited to, ethanol and isopropanol. The employer did not develop and implement a worksite specific written hazard communication program, on or about 06/27/14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Production: Employees were not provided the information and training on the hazard(s) associated with exposure to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, ethanol and isopropanol, on or about 06/27/14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Production: Production employees are required to wear a half-face negative pressure respirator. The employer did not establish and implement a worksite-specific written respiratory protection program, on or about 06/27/14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) Production: Production employees were required to wear a half-face negative pressure respirator (MSA Comfo Classic) but were not fit-tested prior to initial use of the respirator, on or about 06/27/14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.141 D02 IV
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(2)(iv): Lavatories were not provided with individual hand towels or sections thereof, of cloth or paper, warm air blowers or clean individual sections of continuous cloth toweling: a) Packaging department: Bathrooms were not provided with hand towels or warm air blowers, on or about 06/27/14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Interfashion Cosmetics Corp.
View Interfashion Cosmetics Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325620)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339826844.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.