SYRACUSE, NY —
OSHA Inspection: MIDSTATE SPRING INC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MIDSTATE SPRING INC in 4054 NEW COURT AVENUE, SYRACUSE, NY 13206 (NAICS 332612). OSHA activity number 339829004.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIDSTATE SPRING INC
- Site address
- 4054 NEW COURT AVENUE
- City
- SYRACUSE
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13206
- Mailing
- PO BOX 850, SYRACUSE, NY 13206
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332612
- Employees
- 44
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a) At the establishment, on or about 6/30/14: Where employees perform servicing and/or maintenance on various machinery and equipment, including, but not limited to coilers, formers, grinders, air compressors, etc., the employer had not established specific energy control procedures to prevent the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy of the equipment. Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, moving parts, pinch points, flying chips and sparks: a) Coiling Dept., on or about 6/30/14: Point of operation, moving parts and pinch points were not guarded on two Torin Model Z11, #1 and #2 high speed coilers and ingoing nip points on the feed rollers for both machines were not guarded. b) Coiling Dept., on or about 6/30/14: Point of operation, moving parts and pinch points were not guarded on the Torin CNC 5 axis Model 11A coiler and a Torin 5 axis Model 115A coiler. c) Coiling Dept., on or about 6/30/14: Point of operation, moving parts and pinch points were not guarded on two JM System C200 coilers #1 and #2 and ingoing nip points on the wire straighteners on both machines were not guarded. d) Forming Dept., on or about 6/30/14: Point of operation, moving parts and pinch points were not adequately guarded on the sides of a Haya forming machine 15G. e) Forming Dept., on or about 6/30/14: Point of operation, moving parts and pinch points were not guarded on two MEC FL16 forming machines, MEC CLS16 forming machine, two MEC TM20 forming machines, MEC VM 26 forming machine, Itaya MX-40A forming machine, two MEC TM-8 forming machines, and a Minyu forming machine SF 940. f) Coiling Dept., on or about 6/30/14: Point of operation, moving parts and pinch points were not guarded on a Tori CNC 4 axis #1 coiler, Torin 12A mechanical coiler, KHM 1.6 coiler and two Itaya PC15 coilers. g) Coiling Dept., on or about 6/30/14: Point of operation, moving parts and pinch points were not guarded on an Itaya PC35 coiler and ingoing nip points on the wire straightener were not guarded. h) Coiling Dept., on or about 6/30/14: Point of operation, moving parts and pinch points were not guarded on three Simco 208 coilers, MEC SH3 coiler and a MEC WH8 coiler. i) Secondary Dept., on or about 6/30/14: Point of operation, moving parts and pinch points were not guarded on a MEC SH16 coiler/former. j) Tool Room, on or about 6/30/14: Rotating chuck on a Wilton drill press was not guarded. Abatement certification must be submitted for these items.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1785
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective: a) Forming Dept., on or about 6/30/14: A floor fan behind the Minyu forming machine SF940 was not grounded in that the ground pin was missing from the plug end. Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Midstate Spring INC
View Midstate Spring INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332612)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339829004.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.