Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LEWIS SPRING AND MFG. COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LEWIS SPRING AND MFG. COMPANY in 7500 N. NATCHEZ AVE., NILES, IL 60714 (NAICS 332613). OSHA activity number 339831307.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lewis Spring and MFG. Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lewis Spring and MFG. Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7500 N. NATCHEZ AVE.
City
NILES
State
IL
ZIP
60714
Mailing
7500 N. NATCHEZ AVE., NILES, IL 60714
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332613
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.136 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Sep 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards:  a) Shipping/Receiving -  On July 1, 2014, the employer did not ensure that each employee used protective footwear (steel toed shoes or work boots) when exposed to foot injury(ies) during the operation of material handling equipment (forklifts) and the handling of steel wire reels weighing approximately 350 pounds.    In accordance with 29CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1666
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,083 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:   a) Facility Wide -  On or about July 1, 2014, the employer failed to conduct periodic inspections to review each authorized employees knowledge of the procedure at least annually to verify the procedure is adequate and being applied properly by all maintenance personnel, set-up persons, and any and all other authorized level employees.    In accordance with 29CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2082.5
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  a) Coiling Machine Area - On July 1, 2014, the C31 coiling machine's dereeler had a pulley that was not guarded.  In accordance with 29CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1666
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs 42 inches or less from the floor level were not fully enclosed by guards conforming to requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  a) Coiling Machine Area - On July 1, 2014, the C31 coiling machine's dereeler had a horizontal belt that was not fully enclosed by a guard.   In accordance with 29CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 F01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,023 · Current $1,416 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1): Gear(s) were not guarded by a complete enclosure or by one of the methods specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(1)(iii):  a) Shop Area -  On July 1, 2014, the Torrington W-12 (s/n 72464) (# C22) spring coiler had gears that were not guarded on the backside of the machine.  b) Shop Area - On July 1, 2014, the C64 #3 spring coiler had gears that were not guarded on the backside of the machine.  No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1416.1
  • — Z (S) $2023

1910.179 G01 V

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(g)(1)(v): Pendant control box(es) were not clearly marked for identification of functions:   a) Coiling Machine Area - The pendant control box (BW72Y511) for the Yale 2 ton overhead crane hoist was not marked for identification of functions.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Lewis Spring and MFG. Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339831307.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.