Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: LEONARD & HARRAL PACKING COMPANY INC.

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of LEONARD & HARRAL PACKING COMPANY INC. in 715 STEVES, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78210 (NAICS 311611). OSHA activity number 339833816.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Leonard & Harral Packing Company INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Leonard & Harral Packing Company INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
715 STEVES
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78210
Mailing
P.O. BOX 831368, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78283
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311611
Employees
344
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 29, 2014
Abate by
Apr 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer did not compile information pertaining to the equipment in the process:    L&H Packing facility, San Antonio, Texas: On July 1, 2014, and times prior thereto, the employer did not compile complete and accurate information representative of the ammonia refrigeration process as follows:    a) Process safety information for V-6 is missing and/or not included in the employer's equipment files.  b) The King air unit is installed in the field, but is missing from the current P&IDs.  c) OER-R3 VRT freezer recirculator descriptive information is not available on the P&IDs.  d) V-16 chiller oil pot detail is not included in the employer's equipment files.  e) Pressure relief valves are not individually identifiable - several PRVs installed in the facility have identical serial numbers.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.119 E03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i): The process hazard analysis did not address the hazards of the process:    L&H Packing facility, San Antonio, Texas: On July 1, 2014, and times prior thereto, the employer did not evaluate the hazards of installing and operating general electrical equipment in a Class I, Division 2 electrically hazardous area when the PHA and PHA revalidations for the Ammonia refrigeration system were performed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4900
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.307 C03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.307(c)(3): Equipment was not safe for the location in that it was not of a type and design that the employer demonstrated would provide protection from the hazards arising from the combustibility and flammability of vapors, liquids, gases, dusts, or fibers involved:  L&H Packing facility, San Antonio, Texas: On July 1, 2014, and times prior thereto, the employer failed to ensure that electrical equipment, including but not limited to lighting, motors, and wiring, which was installed in hazardous (classified) locations, was safe for the hazardous (classified) location, as follows:   a) The Old Engine Room is a hazardous location with general electrical equipment installed in it. b) The New Engine Room is a hazardous location with general electrical equipment installed in it.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.119 D03 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 29, 2014
Abate by
Apr 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices:  L&H Packing facility, San Antonio, Texas: On July 1, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not document that the ventilation system for the engine room of the ammonia refrigeration system complies with RAGAGEP as follows:  a) The employer did not ensure and document that electrical equipment installed in the main engine room is safe for operation in a hazardous area.  b) The employer did not ensure that an alarm will be triggered whenever the ventilation system operating under non-emergency  continuous mode fails.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.119 N

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(n): The employer's emergency action plan did not include procedures for handling small releases:     L&H Packing facility, San Antonio, Texas: On July 1, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer's emergency action plan did not include procedures for handling small releases of highly hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to anhydrous ammonia and chlorine.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.120 Q01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): The emergency response plan was not in writing and was not available for inspection and copying by employees, their representatives, and OSHA personnel:  L&H Packing facility, San Antonio, Texas: On July 1, 2014, and times prior thereto, the the employer did not develop an emergency response plan to guide its employees in response to releases of highly hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to anhydrous ammonia and chlorine.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  L&H Packing facility, 715 Steves, San Antonio, TX: On July 1, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide medical evaluations to employees prior to requiring them to use and don air purifying respirators in the engine rooms of the ammonia refrigeration system.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $7000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339833816.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.