Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: PUMP & POWER EQUIPMENT

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of PUMP & POWER EQUIPMENT in 5285 SCHURMIER ROAD, HOUSTON, TX 77048 (NAICS 333911). OSHA activity number 339836181.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pump & Power Equipment for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pump & Power Equipment is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5285 SCHURMIER ROAD
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77048
Mailing
5285 SCHURMIER, HOUSTON, TX 77048
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333911
Employees
29
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.      Shop area; employees used a Buffalo drill press machine, model DM-58-125, serial number 072412 without a guard,  exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1785
  • · Z (S) $2975

1910.243 C01 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1)(ii)(a): A safety guard did not cover the spindle end, nut and flange projections. The safety guard was not mounted so as to maintain proper alignment with the wheel, and the strength of the fastenings shall exceed the strength of the guard.      Shop area; employees used a Milwaukee portable hand held grinder, serial number 938B6072900045 without a guard, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1785
  • · Z (S) $2975

1910.134 D01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $500 · Current $300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select a NIOSH-certified respirator. The respirator was not used in compliance with the conditions of its certification.      Shop area; employees wore respirators that were not NIOSH approved, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $300
  • · Z (O) $500

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $595 · Current $357 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of this section, was not provided by the employer in any written or oral format, to employees who wear respirators when such use is not required by this section or by the employer.      Shop area; the employer did not provide employees who wore dust masks with Appendix D, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $357
  • · Z (O) $595

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $595 · Current $357 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training.       Shop Area; the employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for Safety-Kleen premium solvent used by employees which contained hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to distillates (petroleum), hydrotreated light, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $357
  • · Z (O) $595

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339836181.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.