OSHA Inspection: CITIZEN PRINTING CO.

Issued

Jul 9, 2014

Abate by

Jul 29, 2014

Penalty

Initial $1,785 · Current $1,785

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):  Machine guarding was not provided to protect operators employees from hazards created by ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  (a)Citizen Printing Co. at 1309 Webster Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80524: Machine guarding was not provided in that part of the front cover of the cutter was not in place which exposed a smooth rotating wheel.  This condition exposed the employees to a laceration hazard.

Issued

Jul 9, 2014

Abate by

Jul 29, 2014

Penalty

Initial $2,380 · Current $2,380

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1):  Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) & (o):  (a) Citizen Printing Co. at 1309 Webster Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80524:  The employer did not ensure that the belt and pulley apparatus on the Original Heidelberg known as the "old printing machine" within arms reach of the employees was guarded.  This condition exposed employees to an amputation hazard.

Issued

Jul 9, 2014

Abate by

Jul 29, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):   The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure and employee training to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment would be isolated, and rendered inoperative in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4):  (a)Citizen Printing Co. at 1309 Webster Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80524:  The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure and employee training to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, including but not limited to the large presses.  This condition has the potential to expose the employee to an amputation hazard.  Abatement Note:  As part of an energy-control program, employers must:  (1)Establish energy-control procedures for removing the energy supply from machines and for putting appropriate lockout or tagout devices on the energy-isolating devices to prevent unexpected reenergization.  When appropriate, the procedure also must address stored or potentially reaccumulated energy. (2)Train employees on the energy-control program, including the safe application, use, and removal of energy controls; and (3)Inspect these procedures periodically (at least annually) to ensure that they are being followed and that they remain effective in preventing employee exposure to hazardous energy.  The energy-control procedures must outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques that employees will use to control hazardous energy sources, as well as the means that will be used to enforce compliance.  These procedures must provide employees at least the following information:  (1)A statement on how to use the procedures; (2)Specific procedural steps to shut down, isolate, block, and secure machines; (3)Specific steps designating the safe placement, removal, and transfer of lockout/tagout devices and identifying who has responsibility for the lockout/tagout devices; and (4)Specific requirements for testing machines to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy-control measures.