AUSTIN, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ELLIOTT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of ELLIOTT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. in 1900 RIO GRANDE, AUSTIN, TX 78705 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339839912.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELLIOTT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 1900 RIO GRANDE
- City
- AUSTIN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78705
- Mailing
- 1606 CORONADO DRIVE, LEANDER, TX 78641
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
22809010P104S103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: For work performed at 1900 Rio Grande Street in Austin, Texas: On or about July 3, 2014 and at times prior thereto and thereafter, chemical hazard communication training provided to employees did not include information on the health hazards of chemicals associated with construction operations, and how to protect themselves from chemical exposures, including, but not limited to crystalline silica dust, Portland Cement, and styrene, exposing employees to the hazards of chemical inhalation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person (i.e., a person who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards in the surroundings or working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous to employees, and who has authorization to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them): (a) For work performed at 1900 Rio Grande Street in Austin, Texas: On or about July 3, 2014 and at times prior thereto, inspections of the job site were inadequate in that the employer failed to identify and correct improper methods used by the tile contractor for cutting HardieBacker 500 Cement Board that were exposing employees to respirable crystalline silica. The contractor used powered tool(s) to cut HardieBacker 500 Cement Boards in lieu of manufacturer-recommended methods for installation, such as use of fiber cement shears for cutting or use of a score and snap method, exposing employees of the host employer and contractors to the hazards of crystalline silica inhalation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339839912.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.