Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: A.T.A. FINISHING CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of A.T.A. FINISHING CORPORATION in 8225 KIMBALL AVE, SKOKIE, IL 60076 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 339841785.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A.T.A. Finishing Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A.T.A. Finishing Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8225 KIMBALL AVE
City
SKOKIE
State
IL
ZIP
60076
Mailing
8225 KIMBALL AVE, SKOKIE, IL 60076
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2014
Abate by
Jan 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced

Hazardous substances 068922602310

29 CFR 1910.22(c): Covers and/or guardrails were not provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open pits, tanks, vats, ditches, etc.    a) A.T.A. Finishing Corporation did not provide guardrails or covers on finishing tanks to protect employees from fall hazards.  On or about July 9, 2014, employees were observed working on a platform which was only 17 inches below the opening of the tank.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2014
Abate by
Dec 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced

Hazardous substances 068922602310

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    (a) On July 9, 2014, A. T. A. Finishing Corporation did not ensure that employees used appropriate eye protection when working around finishing tanks containing chemicals including sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide.       In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.151 C

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2014
Abate by
Dec 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 068922602310

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.  a) On July 9, 2014, A. T. A. Finishing Corporation did not provide an emergency eye wash facility in the vicinity of the finishing tanks that contained corrosive materials including sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2014
Abate by
Dec 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced

Hazardous substances 068922602310

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:    (a) On July 9, 2014, A.T.A. Finishing Corporation did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein.  Anodizing tanks that did not have posted labels include, but are not limited to: 15% sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide etch tank, and electrobrite aluminum chromate 190.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2014
Abate by
Dec 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 068922602310

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  (a) (a) On July 9, 2014, A.T.A. Finishing Corporation did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings of the chemical(s) contained therein.  Anodizing tanks that did not have posted labels include, but are not limited to: 15% sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide etch tank, and electrobrite aluminum chromate 190.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2014
Abate by
Nov 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):  (a) On or about July 9, 2014, A.T.A. Finishing Corporation did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for chromium (VI).  Employees use Electrobrite Aluminum Chromate 190, a chromium (VI) containing compound, to anodize aluminum parts.    No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2014
Abate by
Jan 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 068922602310

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    a) A.T.A. Finishing Corporation did not provide training to employees by December 1, 2013 on the revised Safety Data Sheet format and content, as well as the new labeling elements as required by the revised hazard communication standard 29 CFR 1910.1200.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339841785.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.