Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SCHELFHOUT & DECLEENE MASONRY INC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SCHELFHOUT & DECLEENE MASONRY INC in 410 OAK STREET, NEENAH, WI 54956 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339846578.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Schelfhout & Decleene Masonry INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Schelfhout & Decleene Masonry INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
410 OAK STREET
City
NEENAH
State
WI
ZIP
54956
Mailing
W3170 SUNSHINE ROAD, KAUKAUNA, WI 54130
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2014
Abate by
Nov 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph:    a)      On or about 07-10-14, employees who were performing masonry work on a north side exterior wall had staged materials on a Walk Through & Ladder Frame scaffold platform greater than twenty-one (21) feet above compacted surface without restraining the scaffold to the structure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2014
Abate by
Nov 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement:     a)      On or about 07-10-14, employees who were working from scaffold at the northern exterior wall main entrance were working from a platform at approximately fourteen (14) feet above compacted surface without sound/rigid footing for the southwest end frame base plate.  b)      On or about 07-10-14, employees who were walking/working from scaffold at an inside corner of the northern exterior wall were working from platforms approximately fourteen (14) and seventeen (17) feet above compacted surface without sound/rigid footing for the northeast end frame base plate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2014
Abate by
Nov 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(i): The area below the scaffold was not barricaded, and employees were not prohibited from entering the hazard area:  a)      On or about 07-10-14,  employees who were performing masonry work from scaffold platforms located approximately fourteen (14) and twenty-one (21) feet directly above an exterior wall main entrance did not barricade the area below the scaffold platform and did not block the doorway from use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2014
Abate by
Nov 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:   a)  On or about 07-10-14, the employer did not have a competent person inspect tubular welded frame scaffold which had defects associated with the footings, required guying and tying, and fall protection on the working levels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2014
Abate by
Nov 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:    a)      On or about 07-10-14, an employee who was working from a scaffold platform at approximately twenty-five (25) feet above compacted surface accessed/egressed the platform by climbing on the scaffold end frame bars.    b)     On or about 07-10-14, employees who were utilizing a scaffold walkway approximately seventeen (17) feet above compacted surface were climbing up and down a top, concrete block wall section a distance of approximately four (4) ft. to access/egress the platform walkway.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2014
Abate by
Nov 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:    a)      On or about 07-10-14, an employee was working from a scaffold platform which was erected on the top edges of a concrete block wall at approximately twenty-five (25) feet above compacted surface without utilizing fall protection equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G04 XV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2014
Abate by
Nov 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): Cross-bracing used in place of a mid-rail was unacceptable because the crossing point of two braces was not between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches (0.8 M) above the work platform, or cross-bracing used as a top-rail was unacceptable because the crossing point was not between 38 inches (0.97 m) and 48 inches (1.3 m) above the work platform:  a)  On or about 07-10-14, an employee was walking/working from scaffold platforms approximately fourteen (14) feet above compacted surface without adequate guard rails along the north side.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2014
Abate by
Nov 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(15): Each employee on a walking/working surface 6 feet (1.8 meters) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  a)      On or about 07-10-14, employees were walking/working on the top surface edges of a concrete block wall at approximately twenty (20) feet above compacted surface without utilizing fall protection equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Schelfhout & Decleene Masonry INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339846578.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.