Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: IMPREGLON CELLRAMIC, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of IMPREGLON CELLRAMIC, INC. in 8399 N. 87TH ST., MILWAUKEE, WI 53224 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 339846677.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Impreglon Cellramic, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Impreglon Cellramic, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8399 N. 87TH ST.
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53224
Mailing
PO BOX 241370, MILWAUKEE, WI 53224
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2014
Abate by
Sep 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards:    (a)  The employer did not ensure portable ladder safety was accomplished by employees using a 12-foot Louisville single extension ladder to gain access to the top of the C1 booth to change hoses:       1) On or about June 19, 2014, an employee ascended a Louisville extension ladder to a height of 10 feet 4 inches while the base was positioned approximately eight feet back.      2) On or about June 19, 2014, an employee ascended the Louisville extension ladder without it extending three feet above the upper landing.      3) The Louisville extension ladder was not inspected for defects prior to use and the second rung from the bottom was bent.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2014
Abate by
Sep 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    (a)  In the production area, employees who access the top of the C1 booth to change hoses are not protected from falling 124 inches to the lower concrete floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2014
Abate by
Sep 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    (a)  Employees were designated to clean up blood and/or other potentially infectious materials when the employer did not develop a written exposure control plan to reduce exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1030 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2014
Abate by
Sep 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure:  (a)  Employees who had an occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials (e.g. cleaning up blood in the workplace) did not have the Hepatitis B vaccination series available to them afterwards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 G02 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2014
Abate by
Oct 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(B): The employer did not ensure that the training was provided to employees with occupational exposure at least annually:    (a)  Employees designated to clean up blood and/or other potentially infectious materials were not provided with training on an annual basis. Training was last conducted on or about February 20, 2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 B03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): The employer did not enter each recordable injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log and 301 Incident Report within seven (7) calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury or illness had occurred:    (a) An injury (on or about June 19, 2014) that resulted in lost-time was not recorded on the OSHA 300 Form within 7 days after occurrence .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2014
Abate by
Oct 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    (a)  The employer did not ensure each employee wearing an elastomeric respirator (e.g. half-mask when cleaning the spray coating booth) was provided with a fit test prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 G01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2014
Abate by
Sep 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i): The employer permitted respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or interfered with valve function:   (a)  The employer did not ensure each employee wearing an elastomeric respirator did not have facial hair that stuck out of the mask.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 A06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2014
Abate by
Sep 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition  (a)  In the production area, the Daewoo forklift did not have a nameplate in a completely legible condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339846677.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.