Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: BRUCE STENNING

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BRUCE STENNING in 421 N 14TH ST, EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL 62201 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 339847097.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bruce Stenning for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bruce Stenning is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BRUCE STENNING
Site address
421 N 14TH ST
City
EAST SAINT LOUIS
State
IL
ZIP
62201
Mailing
705 VOGEL, EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL 62205
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2014
Abate by
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.    One employee was exposed to falls of approximately 8 feet while removing material during a remodeling operation of a single family home, and the employer did not initiate or maintain such programs.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2014
Abate by
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):     One employee was exposed to falls of approximately 8 feet while removing material during a remodeling operation of a single family home, and the employer did not ensure that frequent and regular inspection of the jobsite were conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.502 I03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2014
Abate by
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.502(i)(3): All covers were not secured when installed so as to prevent accidental displacement by the wind, equipment, or employees:  On the ground level of the building employees were exposed to approximately 8 foot fall to the basement level, and an approximately 3 foot by 2 foot cover was not secured to prevent accidental displacement by the employees.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.502 I04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2014
Abate by
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.502(i)(4): All covers were not color coded or marked with the word "HOLE" or "COVER" to provide warning of the hazard:     On the ground level of the building employees were exposed to approximately 8 foot fall to the basement level, and an approximately 3 foot by 2 foot cover was not color coded or marked with the word HOLE or COVER to provide warning of the hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2014
Abate by
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:     One employee was exposed to a fall of approximately 8 feet while removing material during a remodeling operation of a single family home, and the employer did not provide a training program for each employee exposed to the hazards of falls.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339847097.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.