EVANSTON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: F.E. MORAN, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of F.E. MORAN, INC. in 1400 OAKTON STR., EVANSTON, IL 60202 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 339848418.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch F.E. Moran, INC. — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for F.E. Moran, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- F.E. MORAN, INC.
- Site address
- 1400 OAKTON STR.
- City
- EVANSTON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60202
- Mailing
- 2265 CARLSON DRIVE, NORTHBROOK, IL 60062
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238220
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.1101 E01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $7,000
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(1): All Class I, II, and III asbestos work was not conducted within regulated areas. The regulated area did not comply with the requirements listed in paragraphs (2), (3), (4) and (5) of this section: a) On or about 20 June 2014, the employer conducted demolition work in the cafeteria and removed pipe thermal system insulation (TSI) containing 5-35% chrysotile asbestos, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with asbestos. The employer did not ensure that Class I Asbestos work was performed in a regulated area compliant with regulations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7000
- — Z (S) $4500
1926.1101 F01 I
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $7,000
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(1)(i): Where exposure monitoring was required under 29 CFR 1926.1101, the employer did not perform monitoring to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of asbestos to which employees were or potentially were exposed: a) On or about 20 June 2014, the employer did not perform exposure monitoring to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of asbestos to which their employee was exposed to while conducting demolition work in the cafeteria and removing pipe thermal insulation system (TSI) containing 5-35% chrysotile asbestos, thereby exposing their employee to the hazards associated with asbestos.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7000
- — Z (S) $4500
1926.1101 F02 I
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer with a work operation covered by the asbestos standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace: a) On or about 20 June 2014, the employer did not ensure that a competent person conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of demolition work in the cafeteria by their employee removing pipe thermal system insulation (TSI) containing 5-35% chrysotile asbestos, thereby exposing their employee to the hazards associated with asbestos.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1101 G01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $7,000
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(1): The employer did not use engineering controls and work practices listed at (g)(1)(I) through (g)(1)(iii) of this section in all operations covered by 29 CFR 1926.1101, regardless of the levels of the exposure: a) On or about 20 June 2014, the employer did not ensure that their employee conducting demolition work in the cafeteria and removing pipe thermal system insulation (TSI) containing 5-35% chrysotile asbestos, was protected by the following engineering controls and work practices: HEPA vacuums were not used to collect debris and dust, wet methods were not used, and waste and debris was not promptly cleaned up and disposed of, thereby exposing their employee to the hazards associated with asbestos.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7000
- — Z (S) $4500
1926.1101 G02
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(2): The employer did not use the control methods described in paragraphs (g)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section to achieve compliance with the TWA permissible exposure limit and excursion limit prescribed by paragraph (c) of this section: a) On or about 20 June 2014, the employer did not ensure that their employee conducting demolition work in the cafeteria and removing pipe thermal system insulation (TSI) containing 5-35% chrysotile asbestos, was protected from exposure by use of the following control methods: local exhaust ventilation, enclosure or isolation, and/or ventilation of the regulated area, thereby exposing their employee to the hazards associated with asbestos.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4500
1926.1101 G04
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(4): Additional engineering controls and work practices and procedures were not used for Class I work as required by paragraphs (i) through (v) of this section: a) On or about 20 June 2014, the employer did not ensure that their employee conducting demolition work in the cafeteria and removing pipe thermal system insulation (TSI) containing 5-35% chrysotile asbestos, used the following engineering controls, work practices and procedures: operations were not supervised by a competent person, methods to prevent migration of asbestos fibers were not used; impermeable drop cloths were not placed on surfaces below the removal activities; and objects within the area were not covered with impermeable drop cloths, thereby exposing their employee to the hazards associated with asbestos.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4500
1926.1101 G05
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(5): Class I asbestos work was not performed using one or more of the control methods required by 29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(5)(i) through (g)(5)(vi): a) On or about 20 June 2014, the employer did not ensure that their employee conducting demolition work in the cafeteria and removing pipe thermal system insulation (TSI) containing 5-35% chrysotile asbestos, was protected by one or more of the following controls methods: asbestos work was not conducted inside of a negative pressure enclosure or by using glove bag systems, thereby exposing their employee to the hazards associated with asbestos.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.1101 H01 I
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(1)(i): Respirators were not used during all Class I asbestos jobs: a) On or about 20 June 2014, the employer did not ensure that their employee conducting demolition work in the cafeteria and removing pipe thermal system insulation (TSI) containing 5-35% chrysotile asbestos, used respiratory protection, thereby exposing them to the hazards associated with asbestos.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4500
1926.1101 I01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(i)(1): The employer did not provide and require the use of protective clothing, such as coveralls or similar whole-body clothing, head coverings, gloves, and foot coverings for each employee exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos that exceed the time weighted average and/or excursion limit in 29 CFR 1926.1101(c) or for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced: a) On or about 20 June 2014, the employer did not provide their employee conducting demolition work in the cafeteria and removing pipe thermal system insulation (TSI) containing 5-35% chrysotile asbestos, with protective clothing, thereby exposing them to the hazards associated with asbestos.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4500
1926.1101 J02
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(j)(2): The hygiene facilities and practices listed in sections (i) through (v) of this paragraph were not followed for employees performing Class I work involving less than 25 linear or 10 square feet of TSI or surfacing ACM and PACM, and for Class II and Class III asbestos work operations where exposures exceed a PEL or where there is no negative exposure assessment produced before the operation: a) On or about 20 June 2014, the employer did not ensure their employee conducting demolition work in the cafeteria and removing pipe thermal system insulation (TSI) containing 5-35% chrysotile asbestos, were provided with hygiene facilities and practices, thereby exposing them to the hazards associated with asbestos.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4500
1926.1101 K09 I
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $7,000
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(i): The employer did not institute, at no cost to employees, a training program for each employee who was likely to be exposed in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL) and for each employee who performed Class I through IV asbestos operations: a) On or about 20 June 2014, the employer did not institute a training program for their employee conducting demolition work in the cafeteria and removing pipe asbestos thermal insulation system (TSI) containing 5-35% chrysotile asbestos, Class I asbestos work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7000
- — Z (S) $4500
More inspections at F.E. Moran, INC.
Feb 13, 2024
PEORIA, IL
Apr 13, 2022
NORTHBROOK, IL
Apr 13, 2022
NORTHBROOK, IL
Dec 5, 2008
CHAMPAIGN, IL
Feb 13, 2008
LAS VEGAS, NV
View F.E. Moran, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238220)
Jul 16, 2026
Casa Mechanical Services, LTD. · SAN MARCOS, TX
Jul 15, 2026
317744790 - RDA Project Management LLC · SEASIDE, OR
Jul 15, 2026
Professional Stucco & Services INC. · RIO RANCHO, NM
Jul 15, 2026
Diligent AC LLC · BROOKLYN, NY
Jul 15, 2026
American Automatic Sprinkler Company, INC. · PARKVILLE, MD
More inspections in IL
Jul 17, 2026
Quantum Technical Services INC. · FRANKFORT, IL
Jul 17, 2026
Augustana College · ROCK ISLAND, IL
Jul 17, 2026
Sunrun Installation Services, INC. · WASHINGTON, IL
Jul 17, 2026
Conservation of Sculpture & Objects Studio, INC. · FOREST PARK, IL
Jul 17, 2026
Proflow Pumping Solutions · BLUE ISLAND, IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339848418.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.