Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: CONNECTICUT PORTABLE STORAGE

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CONNECTICUT PORTABLE STORAGE in 95 LEGGETT STREET DOOR #11, EAST HARTFORD, CT 06108 (NAICS 531130). OSHA activity number 339849416.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Connecticut Portable Storage for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Connecticut Portable Storage is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
95 LEGGETT STREET DOOR #11
City
EAST HARTFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06108
Mailing
95 LEGGETT STREET, EAST HARTFORD, CT 06108
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
531130
Employees
14
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):   A.  On or about July 21, 2014, facility:  The employer had not conducted a hazard assessment to determine which personal protective equipment would be appropriate for employee use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.134 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Dec 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  A.  On or about July 21, 2014, facility:  Employees who voluntarily wore 3M half face respirators with organic vapor cartridges had not been provided with the information contained in Appendix D with regard to the limitations of respirator use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Dec 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:   A.  On or about July 21, 2014, facility:  The employer had not established elements of a written respiratory program for employees voluntarily wearing respiratory protection.  The employer had not ensured that employees were medically cleared to wear a respirator; that the respirators properly fit the employees; and that the respiratory protection equipment was properly cleaned, maintained and stored.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:   A.  On or about July 21, 2014, facility:  Employees expected to use portable fire extinguishers had not been provided with annual training on their use.  Employees work with flammable spray paints and conduct welding operations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:  A.  On or about July 21, 2014, Workshop:   1.  An unidentified relocatable power tap used to energize a dock light, extension cord and fuel pump was powered through a 50-foot long yellow flexible 3-way extension cord which was in turn energized through a Belkin Surge Master 7-receptacle relocatable power tap mounted above the workbench.  Listing and labeling instructions for relocatable power taps specify they not be plugged into extension cords or into each other.  2.  An Avanti metal cube refrigerator was energized through a 5-foot long yellow flexible 3-way extension cord.  Listing and labeling instructions for the refrigerator specify they be plugged directly into a grounded 3-prong outlet.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $840
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:   A.  On or about July 21, 2014, workshop:  A 50-foot long yellow flexible 3-way extension cord was used in lieu of the fixed wiring of the building to energize an Avanti refrigerator and an unidentified relocatable power tap.  The power tap energized a dock light, extension cord and fuel pump.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.305 G01 IV B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(B): Flexible cords and cables were run through holes in walls, ceilings, or floors:  A.  On or about July 21, 2014, workshop:  A 50-foot yellow flexible 3-way extension cord was run through an opening at the front of the storage pod above the door.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Dec 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  A.  On or about July 21 2014, Facility:  The employer had not developed or implemented a hazard communication program which addressed container labeling, safety data sheets and employee information and training.  Employees use and are exposed to chemicals including but not limited to sodium hydroxide, xylene, toluene, Ethylbenezene, Barium sulfate, and acetone.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Dec 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  A.  On or about July 21, 2014, facility:  The employer had not provided information and training to employees regarding the hazards of the chemicals in their workplace.  Employees worked with spray paints containing xylene, toluene, Ethylbenzene, Barium sulfate, and acetone; and chemical cleaner/degreasers containing sodium hydroxide and Butoxyethanol.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Nov 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:   A.  On or about July 21, 2014, fire extinguishers mounted throughout the facility had not been inspected in more than a year.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339849416.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.