Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: D.B. MILLER INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of D.B. MILLER INC. in 9333 B BROWN LANE, AUSTIN, TX 78754 (NAICS 311999). OSHA activity number 339851677.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch D.B. Miller INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for D.B. Miller INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
D.B. MILLER INC.
Site address
9333 B BROWN LANE
City
AUSTIN
State
TX
ZIP
78754
Mailing
9333 B BROWN LANE, AUSTIN, TX 78754
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311999
Employees
27
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Sep 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate.    On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer allowed various items to be placed on an upper mezzanine level that served as the ceiling of an office area underneath without knowing the load capacity of the ceiling, exposing the employees working in the office to the hazard of being struck by falling beams and various other items in storage.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Sep 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Every open-sided floor or platform 4 feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level shall be guarded by a standard railing (or the equivalent as specified in paragraph (e)(3) of this section) on all open sides except where there is entrance to a ramp, stairway, or fixed ladder. The railing shall be provided with a toeboard wherever, beneath the open sides,    On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees accessed an upper storage area to remove or store various items that did not have guardrails installed, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 9 feet 3 inches to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.25 D02 XII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Sep 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.25(d)(2)(xii): Tops of the ordinary types of stepladders were used as steps.  On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees would use a portable stepladder to access the upper mezzanine level that served as extra storage space by using the top step, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 9 feet 3 inches to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Sep 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted at least once every three years.    On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, two employees who utilize the forklift had not been retrained within the last three years to determine their operating skills and validate their being able to operate the forklift, exposing them and those employees working around them to the hazard of being struck by the forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Sep 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy.    On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer allowed the use of three electrical outlets that had missing or damaged faceplates with exposed energized parts, exposing the employees using them to an electrical hazard of approximately 120 volts.  1) An energized four plug outlet located along the east wall of the warehouse had a damaged faceplate that exposed the internal wires and terminals.  2) An energized four plug outlet located along the north wall of the warehouse had a missing faceplate that exposed the internal wires and terminals.  3) An energized four plug outlet located along the north wall of the warehouse had a damaged faceplate that exposed the internal wires and terminals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.305 C04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Sep 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(c)(4): Faceplates for flush-mounted snap switches. Snap switches mounted in boxes did not have faceplates installed so as to completely cover the opening and seat against the finished surface.  On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees used two light switches to turn on or off the warehouse lights on a daily basis in which the faceplate was missing for both switches, exposing the employees to the electrical hazard of approximately 120 volts.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Sep 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure.     On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, an orange extension cord was being used as fixed wiring within the office area to provide power to a copier machine in which the cord was nailed to the wall with brackets, exposing the employees within the office to a fire hazard due to cord damage.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2100

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339851677.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.