AUSTIN, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: D.B. MILLER INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of D.B. MILLER INC. in 9333 B BROWN LANE, AUSTIN, TX 78754 (NAICS 311999). OSHA activity number 339851677.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- D.B. MILLER INC.
- Site address
- 9333 B BROWN LANE
- City
- AUSTIN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78754
- Mailing
- 9333 B BROWN LANE, AUSTIN, TX 78754
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311999
- Employees
- 27
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 D01
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate. On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer allowed various items to be placed on an upper mezzanine level that served as the ceiling of an office area underneath without knowing the load capacity of the ceiling, exposing the employees working in the office to the hazard of being struck by falling beams and various other items in storage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Every open-sided floor or platform 4 feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level shall be guarded by a standard railing (or the equivalent as specified in paragraph (e)(3) of this section) on all open sides except where there is entrance to a ramp, stairway, or fixed ladder. The railing shall be provided with a toeboard wherever, beneath the open sides, On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees accessed an upper storage area to remove or store various items that did not have guardrails installed, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 9 feet 3 inches to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.25 D02 XII
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.25(d)(2)(xii): Tops of the ordinary types of stepladders were used as steps. On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees would use a portable stepladder to access the upper mezzanine level that served as extra storage space by using the top step, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 9 feet 3 inches to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted at least once every three years. On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, two employees who utilize the forklift had not been retrained within the last three years to determine their operating skills and validate their being able to operate the forklift, exposing them and those employees working around them to the hazard of being struck by the forklift.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy. On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer allowed the use of three electrical outlets that had missing or damaged faceplates with exposed energized parts, exposing the employees using them to an electrical hazard of approximately 120 volts. 1) An energized four plug outlet located along the east wall of the warehouse had a damaged faceplate that exposed the internal wires and terminals. 2) An energized four plug outlet located along the north wall of the warehouse had a missing faceplate that exposed the internal wires and terminals. 3) An energized four plug outlet located along the north wall of the warehouse had a damaged faceplate that exposed the internal wires and terminals.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.305 C04
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(c)(4): Faceplates for flush-mounted snap switches. Snap switches mounted in boxes did not have faceplates installed so as to completely cover the opening and seat against the finished surface. On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees used two light switches to turn on or off the warehouse lights on a daily basis in which the faceplate was missing for both switches, exposing the employees to the electrical hazard of approximately 120 volts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure. On or about 16 July 2014, and at times prior thereto, an orange extension cord was being used as fixed wiring within the office area to provide power to a copier machine in which the cord was nailed to the wall with brackets, exposing the employees within the office to a fire hazard due to cord damage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2100
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311999)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339851677.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.