Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: U.S. DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY DALLAS/TULSA AREA OFFICE

Programmed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related health inspection of U.S. DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY DALLAS/TULSA AREA OFFICE in 2900 E HIGHWAY 10, GROVE, OK 74344 (NAICS 928110). OSHA activity number 339856221.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U.S. Defense Contract Management Agency Dallas/Tulsa Area Office for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U.S. Defense Contract Management Agency Dallas/Tulsa Area Office is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2900 E HIGHWAY 10
City
GROVE
State
OK
ZIP
74344
Mailing
5110 S. YALE AVENUE, TULSA, OK 74135
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
928110
Employees
5
Ownership type
Federal government (D)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1026 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0694

29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1)(i): 29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1): The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to chromium (VI) were provided with information and training as required by the Hazard Communication standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200:     a.  On or about July 22, 2014, supplier establishment, the employer did not comply with general requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200 for hazardous chemicals including but not limited to chromium (VI) present in paint and primer spray operations and anodize operations.  Employees conduct paint and primer and anodize process reviews which expose employees to hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0694

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(ii): The employer did not provide information to the employees on operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals were present:    a.  On or about July 22, 2014, paint department, the employer did not inform employees on operations where hazardous chemicals including but not limited to chromium (VI) were present such as paint and primer spray operations.  Employees conduct paint and primer process review which exposes them to hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:    a.  On or about July 22, 2014, supplier establishment, the employer did not train employees on the health hazards of hazardous chemicals including but not limited to chromium (VI) present in paint and primer spray operations and anodize operations.  Employees conduct process reviews which exposes them to hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0694

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used:    a.  On or about 7/22/14, supplier paint department, the employer did not train employees on appropriate work practices such as staying outside of boundary lines for chromium (VI) regulated areas.  Employees conduct paint and primer process review which exposes them to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to chromium (VI).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339856221.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.