Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARTIN PEREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARTIN PEREZ in 4417-4431 SHERWOOD FORREST COURT, COLUMBUS, OH 43228 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339857393.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Martin Perez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Martin Perez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARTIN PEREZ
Site address
4417-4431 SHERWOOD FORREST COURT
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43228
Mailing
5509 LIEGH RUN CT, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2014
Abate by
Jan 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within ten calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  a.  The employer has failed to submit abatement certification within ten days of the abatement date, October 1, 2014, for a violation of 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1), issued as citation 1, item 1, and described as follows:  At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and used eye protection when using a nail gun to secure shingles, thereby exposing employees to a potential struck-by hazard.  b.  The employer has failed to submit abatement certification within ten days of the abatement date, October 15, 2014, for a violation of 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3), issued as citation 1, item 3, and described as follows:  At the workplace, employees did not retain knowledge needed to recognize hazards relating to falls.  c.  The employer has failed to submit abatement certification within ten days of the abatement date, October 1, 2014, for a violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1), issued as citation 1, item 4, and described as follows:  At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that the extension ladder that employees used to access/exit roof area, was extended at least three feet above the roof working/walking surface, thereby exposing employees to a potential trip/fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2014
Abate by
Jan 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  a.  The employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, October 1, 2014, for a violation of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), issued as citation 1, item 2, and described as follows:  At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees used fall protection when performing roofing work at heights greater than six feet, thereby exposing employees to an approximate 17 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2014
Abate by
Oct 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.     a)     At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and used eye protection when using a nail gun to secure shingles, thereby exposing employees to a potential struck-by hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2014
Abate by
Oct 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.     a)     At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees used fall protection when performing roofing work at heights greater than six feet, thereby exposing employees to an approximate 17 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2014
Abate by
Oct 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.503(c): "Retraining." When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee who has already been trained does not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section, the employer shall retrain each such employee. Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where:  29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill.     a)     At the workplace, employees did not retain knowledge needed to recognize hazards relating to falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2014
Abate by
Oct 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.     a)     At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that the extension ladder that employees used to access/exit roof area, was extended at least three feet above the roof working/walking surface, thereby exposing employees to a potential trip/fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

View Martin Perez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339857393.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.