Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: VAN AM TOOL AND ENGINEERING LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of VAN AM TOOL AND ENGINEERING LLC in 5025 SE EASTON ROAD, SAINT JOSEPH, MO 64507 (NAICS 333514). OSHA activity number 339866246.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch VAN AM Tool and Engineering LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for VAN AM Tool and Engineering LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5025 SE EASTON ROAD
City
SAINT JOSEPH
State
MO
ZIP
64507
Mailing
5025 SE EASTON ROAD, SAINT JOSEPH, MO 64507
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333514
Employees
69
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 44 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2014
Abate by
Oct 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge:     (a) Back-up compressor room, NE corner; Employees were exposed to fire hazards because the exit door was not unlocked or could not be opened with a single action. Employees could not open the exit door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.95 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2014
Abate by
Dec 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    On or about July 29, 2014, at 5025 Easton Road, Saint Joseph, Missouri 64507:    In and around the vibratory deburing machine, employees were exposed to noise levels equal or exceeding an 8 hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent and an effective hearing conservation program was not implemented.    (a) A robotic welder operator was exposed to 74.8% dose of the allowable 8 hour time weighted average sound level of 90 dBA or an equivalent 8 hour time weighted average sound level of approximately 87.9 dBA during a 455 minute sampling period on 07/29/14. Zero exposure was assumed for the remaining unsampled portion of the 8 hour shift.    (b) A vibratory deburing operator was exposed to 162.6% dose of the allowable 8 hour time weighted average sound level of 90 dBA or an equivalent 8 hour time weighted average sound level of approximately 93.5 dBA during a 457 minute sampling period on 07/29/14. Zero exposure was assumed for the remaining unsampled portion of the 8 hour shift.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.178 L01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2014
Abate by
Oct 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck:    a) Laser room and warehouse; a new employee was observed operating the 5,000 ton propane powered industrial truck. The new employee had not yet been trained to drive a powered industrial truck.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 12 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2014
Abate by
Oct 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines, whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.    (a) CNC room; Employees were exposed to amputation hazards caused when the CNC machine interlocks were disengaged. This allowed employees to open the CNC doors during machine operation. Many CNC machines were operating with the interlocks disengaged.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3430
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.215 B09

Other-than-serious 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2014
Abate by
Oct 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): 29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):  The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch.    a) CNC room, Stanley Handyman pedestal grinder: Employees were exposed to potential struck-by and impalement hazards when the tongue guard on the left side of the grinder was not properly adjusted to within one fourth of an inch of the periphery of the grinding stone.    b) CNC room, Hammond of Kalamazoo pedestal grinder: Employees were exposed to potential struck-by and impalement hazards when the tongue guard on the left side of the grinder was not properly adjusted to within one fourth of an inch of the periphery of the grinding stone.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $840
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339866246.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.