NORTH SYRACUSE, NY —
OSHA Inspection: ANGELO'S ROOFING COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ANGELO'S ROOFING COMPANY in MUG SHOTZ, 608 NORTH MAIN STREET, NORTH SYRACUSE, NY 13212 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339869059.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANGELO'S ROOFING COMPANY
- Site address
- MUG SHOTZ, 608 NORTH MAIN STREET
- City
- NORTH SYRACUSE
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13212
- Mailing
- 114 MARY STREET, SYRACUSE, NY 13203
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.403 I02 I
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(i)(2)(i): Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or other forms of enclosures, nor by any of the means listed in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of this paragraph: a) East end of roof, on or about 7-25-14: Employees were installing shingles on a roof that was inches from an energized service entrance mast/weather head.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $800
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) North side of roof, on or about 7-25-14: Employees were working on a flat portion of roof, without fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 22 feet. b) North side of roof, on or about 7-25-14: Employees were working on a 5:12 pitch roof, without fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 9 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $800
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) Entire roof, on or about 7-25-14: Three employees were working on a roof without the training necessary for those employees to recognize the hazards associated with falls and their work, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of up to 22 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $800
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a) East end of roof, on or about 7-25-14: Employees were accessing the upper roof level via an adjustable, multi-position ladder that was 8 inches below the landing surface, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 13 feet. b) North side of building, on or about 7-25-14: Employees were accessing the upper roof level via an adjustable, multi-position ladder that was extended approximately 16 inches above the landing surface, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 9 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $640
- — C (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B20
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(20): Employees did not face the ladder when ascending or descending the ladder: a) East end of roof, on or about 7-25-14: Employees were exiting the upper roof level while facing away from the portable ladder, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 13 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B21
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(21): Employees were not grasping the ladder with at least one hand when progressing up and/or down the ladder: a) North side of building, on or about 7-25-14: One employee accessed a roof via a portable ladder, without the use of his hands, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 9 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Angelo'S Roofing Company
View Angelo'S Roofing Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339869059.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.