Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: QUICK AND KLEEN

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of QUICK AND KLEEN in 542 PERSHING, POCATELLO, ID 83201 (NAICS 562219). OSHA activity number 339873267.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Quick and Kleen for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Quick and Kleen is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
QUICK AND KLEEN
Site address
542 PERSHING
City
POCATELLO
State
ID
ZIP
83201
Mailing
542 PERSHING, POCATELLO, ID 83201
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562219
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) Off site jobs: On or about July 28, 2014, and at times prior thereto, where employees are required to wear tight-fitting, MSA and 3M respirators, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program implemented at the workplace.     Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) Off site jobs: On or about July 28, 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees required to wear respirators had not been medically evaluated prior to use.        NOTE: Abatement certification IS required for this item..
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  (a) Off site jobs: On or about July 28, 2014, and at times prior thereto, and at times prior thereto, employees required to wear respirators had not been fit tested prior to use.         Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1): Respirators were not cleaned and disinfected using the procedures in Appendix B-2 of 29 CFR 1910.134 or equivalent procedures recommended by the respirator manufacturer:  (a) Off site jobs: On or about July 28, 2014, and at times prior thereto, and at times prior thereto, respirators being worn by employees had not been cleaned properly prior to use.         Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  (a) Off site jobs: On or about July 28, 2014, and at times prior thereto, and at times prior thereto, respirators being worn by employees were not being stored properly to protect them from contamination and dust.         Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   a) Throughout the facility, on or about August 30, 2012 and at times prior thereto, where employees were exposed to chemicals, there was no written hazard communication program in place.  Note:  Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339873267.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.