NEW BERLIN, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: HAROLD E. ARNDT, INC.
Programmed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Other safety inspection of HAROLD E. ARNDT, INC. in 5375 SOUTH TWO PONDS CT., NEW BERLIN, WI 53146 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339874869.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HAROLD E. ARNDT, INC.
- Site address
- 5375 SOUTH TWO PONDS CT.
- City
- NEW BERLIN
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53146
- Mailing
- 729 CLARE LANE, HARTFORD, WI 53027
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Other (K)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): (a) The employer failed to ensure that job site inspections were conducted to ensure employees were not exposed to hazards. This exposed employees to fall hazards while working on scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: (a) The employer failed to ensure that employees working on a tubular welded scaffold system were protected from falling to the lower level by the use of an approved fall protection system. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. (a) The employer failed to ensure employees working on an overhang were protected from falling to the lower level by the use of an appropriate fall protection system. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer failed to ensure that employees, which will be or are likely to be exposed to fall hazards during their normal work duties, were provided with fall protection training by a competent person. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339874869.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.