Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: COOKSEY IRON & METAL COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COOKSEY IRON & METAL COMPANY, INC. in 801 EAST SECOND STREET, TIFTON, GA 31794 (NAICS 423510). OSHA activity number 339877078.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cooksey Iron & Metal Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cooksey Iron & Metal Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
801 EAST SECOND STREET
City
TIFTON
State
GA
ZIP
31794
Mailing
P.O. BOX 391, TIFTON, GA 31793
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423510
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,310 · Current $1,590 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    a) Rear Warehouse Area, Third Loading Dock - On or about July 31, 2014 and times prior to, the employer did not ensure that the elevated platform around the loading dock well was guarded by standard railings (or equivalent), exposing employees to fall hazards of up to approximately 54 inches (4.5 feet).     b) Rear Warehouse Area, Third Loading Dock - On or about July 31, 2014 and times prior to, the employer did not ensure that the bridge platform that employees used to walk across the loading dock well was guarded by standard railings (or equivalent), exposing employees to fall hazards of up to approximately 54 inches (4.5 feet).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1590
  • — Z (S) $2310

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Oct 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,848 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not provided when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    a) Warehouse Area - On or about July 31, 2014 and at times prior to, employees whose arms were exposed to sparks while performing oxygen/acetylene torch cutting were not required to wear protective clothing, exposing employees to burn hazards and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1848
  • — Z (S) $3080

1910.184 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,273 · Current $1,970 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(1): Sling(s) that were damaged or defective were used:    a) Warehouse Area, Crane #3 - On or about July 31, 2014 and times prior to, a damaged alloy steel chain sling was not removed from service, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1970
  • — Z (S) $3273

1910.1200 E01

Repeat 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $154 · Current $92 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) Throughout Warehouse - On or about April 2, 2014 and times prior to, the employers written hazard communication program was not adequate in that it did not describe how the criteria required in this section related to labels and other forms of warning and employee information and training will be met, exposing employees to possible skin and eye irritations from chemicals including but not limited to diesel fuel, oxygen and acetylene.     The Cooksey Steel Company, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard [29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)], which was contained in OSHA inspection number 513358, citation number 2, item number 1a and was affirmed as a final order on January 15, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 801 E. 2nd St., Tifton, GA 31794.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $92
  • — Z (R) $154

1910.1200 H01

Repeat 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    a) Throughout Warehouse - On or about July 31, 2014 and times prior to, employees were not provided with effective hazardous communication training exposing employees to possible skin and eye irritations from chemicals including but not limited to oxygen and acetylene.     The Cooksey Steel Company, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard [29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1)], which was contained in OSHA inspection number 513358, citation number 2, item number 1a and was affirmed as a final order on January 15, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 801 E. 2nd St., Tifton, GA 31794.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    a) Throughout Warehouse - On or about April 2, 2014 and times prior to, employees were not provided with effective hazardous communication training by December 1, 2013 regarding the new label elements and safety data sheets format, exposing employees to possible skin and eye irritations from chemicals including but not limited to oxygen and acetylene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Cooksey Iron & Metal Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339877078.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.