Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WALTER WURDACK, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WALTER WURDACK, INC. in 4977 FYLER AVE., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63139 (NAICS 325510). OSHA activity number 339879579.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Walter Wurdack, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Walter Wurdack, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4977 FYLER AVE.
City
SAINT LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63139
Mailing
4977 FYLER AVE., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63139
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325510
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(ii): Category 1 or 2 flammable liquids, or Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 °F (37.8 °C), were dispensed into containers without the nozzle and container being electrically interconnected:   a) Walter Wurdack, Inc. @ 4977 Fyler Ave., St. Louis, MO 63139: On and before August 26, 2014, the employer did not ensure that flammable liquids were electrically interconnected. An employee poured a Class 3 flammable liquid, HPP 1161 which had a flash point of 80 °F, from a steel drum into a steel mixing vessel without first bonding the containers. This condition exposed the employee to a fire hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1190
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $714 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1377

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) Walter Wurdack, Inc. @ 4977 Fyler Ave., St. Louis, MO 63139: On and before August 2, 2014, the employer did not establish and implement a respiratory protection program. Employees were provided and required to wear 3M elastomeric, half-face, air-purifying respirators, which were equipped with combination (organic vapor and particulate) filters when they manufactured paint products.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $714
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1377

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify or evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form:     a) Walter Wurdack, Inc. @ 4977 Fyler Ave., St. Louis, MO 63139: On and before August 2, 2014, the employer did not evaluate respiratory hazards associated with mixing paint products that included Desmodur N100, a product which contains 1,6 hexamethylene diisocyanate, a chemical known to cause respiratory sensitization and can lead to the development of work-related asthma.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1377

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator before the employee was required to use the respirator in the workplace:     a) Walter Wurdack, Inc. @ 4977 Fyler Ave., St. Louis, MO 63139: On and before August 2, 2014, the employer did not ensure that medical evaluations were provided to employees prior to the use of 3M elastomeric, half-face, air-purifying respirators, which were equipped with combination (organic vapor and particulate) filters.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1377

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  The employer did not ensure that employees who used tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    a) Walter Wurdack, Inc. @ 4977 Fyler Ave., St. Louis, MO 63139: On and before August 2, 2014, the employer did not ensure that fit tests werer provided to employees prior to the usage of a 3M elastomeric, half-face, air-purifying respirator, which was equipped with combination (organic vapor and particulate) filters.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1377

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to employees who were required to use a respirator:       a)      Walter Wurdack, Inc. @ 4977 Fyler Ave., St. Louis, MO 63139: On and before August 2, 2014, the employer did not ensure that respirator training was provided to employees prior to the issuance and required usage of 3M elastomeric, half-face, air-purifying respirator, which was equipped with combination (organic vapor and particulate) filters.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 O01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(o)(1): The employer did not ensure that only stable or safely arranged loads were handled:     a) Walter Wurdack, Inc. @ 4977 Fyler Ave., St. Louis, MO 63139: On and before August 26, 2014, the employer did not ensure that the drums positioned horizontally on the tines of the forklift were safely arranged. Employees used the forklift to lift and pour drums into mixing vessels a condition that created struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $952
  • — Z (S) $1360

View Walter Wurdack, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339879579.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.