Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NEIMAN MARCUS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NEIMAN MARCUS in 1450 ALA MOANA BLVD 2101, HONOLULU, HI 96814 (NAICS 452111). OSHA activity number 339880486.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Neiman Marcus — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Neiman Marcus is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NEIMAN MARCUS
Site address
1450 ALA MOANA BLVD 2101
City
HONOLULU
State
HI
ZIP
96814
Mailing
1450 ALA MOANA BLVD 2101, HONOLULU, HI 96814
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
452111
Employees
5000
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2014
Abate by
Sep 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:  a.  On August 1, 2014, in the receiving/loading dock, an energized four-plex outlet was missing faceplate exposing employees to an electrical shock hazards while plugging or unplugging cords.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 6 instances 35 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2014
Abate by
Sep 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate:  a) On August 1, 2014, in gift gallery stockroom, employees were exposed to the struck-by hazard of potentially overloading the overhead storage.  b) On August 1, 2014, in men's sportswear stockroom employees were exposed to the struck-by hazard of potentially overloading the overhead storage.  c) On August 1, 2014, in men's suits stockroom, employees were exposed to the struck-by hazard of potentially overloading the overhead storage.  d) On August 1, 2014, in children's stockroom, employees were exposed to the struck-by hazard of potentially overloading the overhead storage.  e) On August 1, 2014, in makeup stockroom, employees were exposed to the struck-by hazard of potentially overloading the overhead storage.  f) On August 1, 2014, in Cusp stockroom, employees were exposed to the struck-by hazard of potentially overloading the overhead storage.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.36 G04

Other-than-serious 3 instances 35 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2014
Abate by
Sep 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(4): Objects that projected into the exit route reduced the width of the exit route to less than the 28 inches minimum width requirements for exit routes:  a) On August 1, 2014; in the gift stockroom, material and products protruded into the passageway reduced the emergency egress to less than 28 inches.   b) On August 1, 2014; in the gift stockroom, material and products protruded into the passageway reduced the emergency egress to less than 28 inches.   c) On August 1, 2014; in the children's stockroom, material and products protruded into the passageway reduced the emergency egress to less than 28 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.158 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 120 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2014
Abate by
Sep 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.158(c)(2)(i): The employer did not assure that hose outlets and connections were accessible to employees:  a.  On August 1, 2014, in the load/receiving dock area, employees were exposed to a trip and fire hazard from material stored in front of the fire suppression system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.303 G01 II

Other-than-serious 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2014
Abate by
Sep 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage:  a) On August 1, 2014, in the electrical closet on the third floor, material was stored in front of the electrical panel exposed employees to electrical hazards.  b) On August 1, 2014, in the kitchen on the third floor, material was stored in front of the electrical panel exposed employees to electrical hazards.  c) On August 1, 2014, in the receiving/ loading dock, material was stored in front of the electrical panel exposed employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Neiman Marcus's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339880486.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.