Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ETS CONTRACTING INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ETS CONTRACTING INC. in 2695 HAMBURG STREET, SCHENECTADY, NY 12303 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339884165.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ETS Contracting INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ETS Contracting INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2695 HAMBURG STREET
City
SCHENECTADY
State
NY
ZIP
12303
Mailing
235 VLEY ROAD, SCOTIA, NY 12302
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2014
Abate by
Sep 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)  During roofing work -- On or prior to 8/6/14, the employer did not ensure that the jobsite, materials, and equipment, including but not limited to:  extension cord sets and receptacles, fire protection equipment, and fall protection system(s),  were inspected by competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2014
Abate by
Sep 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites.  (a) During roofing work -- On or prior to 8/6/14, two extension cordset(s) plugged into exterior receptacle(s) of the building were not provided with ground-fault protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:  (a) During roofing work -- On or prior to 8/6/14, an extension cord with damage to both the female plug end and cuts in the outer jacket/exposed conductors was used to power a heat gun.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.502 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1): The employer did not did not designate a competent person to monitor the safety of other employees and/or did not ensure that the safety monitor complied with the requirements listed in (h)(1)(i) through (h)(1)(v) of this section:  (a) During roofing work -- On or prior to 8/6/14, the employer did not designate a competent person to monitor the safety of employees during installation of a TPO roof system; employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.503 A02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2014
Abate by
Sep 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used.  (a) During roofing work -- On or prior to 8/6/14, the employer did not ensure that each employee was trained in the recognition and avoidance of fall hazards associated with work on a flat roof, including use of safety monitoring systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.150 C01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(i): A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 2A, was not provided for each 3,000 square feet of the protected building area, or major fraction thereof:  During roofing work -- On or about 8/6/14, a portable fire extinguisher was not available on the roof where employees were using heat guns, torches, and applying TPO adhesive (a combustible liquid).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View ETS Contracting INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339884165.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.