COLUMBUS, GA —
OSHA Inspection: MILLER-MIZE PRECAST, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MILLER-MIZE PRECAST, INC. in 2702 MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BLVD, COLUMBUS, GA 31906 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 339891053.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MILLER-MIZE PRECAST, INC.
- Site address
- 2702 MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BLVD
- City
- COLUMBUS
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31906
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 5693, COLUMBUS, GA 31906
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 28
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition. a) Form/Mold Shop: The employer failed to ensure that the ledges and equipment were clear of accumulations of wood dust created from manufacturing precast molds. Employees were exposed to a fire hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): Floor(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition. a) Form/Mold Shop: The employer failed to ensure that the workroom floor was clear of accumulations of wood dust created from manufacturing precast molds. Employees were exposed to a fire hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): a) Production Area; The employer failed to assess the workplace to determine the presence of hazards that would warrant the use of personal protective equipment. Employees were exposed to flying particles while cutting wood, Portland Cement while making concrete forms in the Batching and Production Floor areas, and xylene and ethyl benzene (Form Seal) in the Production Floor Area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.213 D01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1): Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut. a) Form/Mold Area: The employer failed to ensure that the circular Allen-Bradley table saw was guarded. Employees were exposed to unguarded blades while using table saws to cut wood pieces for molds.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2940
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.213 I01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(i)(1): Non-working portion(s) of the blade of bandsaw(s) were not enclosed or guarded. a) Form/Mold Area: The employer failed to ensure that employees were using the adjustable guard to cover the non-working portion of the bandsaw blade. Employees were exposed to an unguarded, non-working portion of the blade of the Rockwell/Delta bandsaw while cutting wood for use in the precast molds.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met. a) Warehouse: The employer had not established or implemented a written Hazard Communication program. Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, White Portland Cement, Western Red Cedar, Sand (silica), Limestone, Hydrochloric Acid, Daracem 100 concrete, and Form Seal (xylene and ethyl benzene)
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area. a) Production Area: Employees were required to work with chemicals such as, but not limited to Western Red Cedar, White Portland Cement, Fine Aggregate (sand), Limestone, Hydrochloric Acid, Form Seal, and Daracem 100 while manufacturing precast structures. The employer did not provide training specific to the hazards of chemicals used at the establishment to all employees working with hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use. a) Batch Area, Form/Mold Shop, Production Floor: The employer had not established or implemented a respiratory protection program for employees required to wear a Moldex 2200 series N95 filtering facepiece. There was no written program, medical evaluations, fit-testing, or training on the respirators worn.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Miller-Mize Precast, INC.
View Miller-Mize Precast, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339891053.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.