Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: A & M PAINTING, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of A & M PAINTING, INC. in JEFFERSON AND PITT, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70115 (NAICS 562910). OSHA activity number 339891848.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A & M Painting, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A & M Painting, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
JEFFERSON AND PITT
City
NEW ORLEANS
State
LA
ZIP
70115
Mailing
6031 S. ROBERTSON ST., NEW ORLEANS, LA 70118
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562910
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2014
Abate by
Dec 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator. (Construction Reference 1926.103)  On or about 8-6-14, on the front porch of a residence in New Orleans, LA, the employer allowed employees to use 3M tight fitting facepiece respirators while sanding lead based paint off exterior siding without fit testing the employees using the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2240
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.62 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2014
Abate by
Dec 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,240 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period.  a. On or about 8-6-14, on the front porch of a residence in New Orleans, LA, the employer allowed employees to be exposed to a lead concentration that exceeded the 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms per cubic meter. A worker on the porch, that was sanding lead based paint off the exterior siding of the residence in a tarp enclosure, was exposed to an 8 hour TWA concentration of 5870 micrograms per cubic meter, which is approximately 117 times the PEL. The exposure was derived from a sample taken from a 313 minute period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 167 minutes not sampled.    b. On or about 8-6-14, on the front porch of a residence in New Orleans, LA, the employer allowed employees to be exposed to a lead concentration that exceeded the 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms per cubic meter. A second worker on the porch, that was sanding lead based paint off the exterior siding of the residence in a tarp enclosure, was exposed to an 8 hour TWA concentration of 10010 micrograms per cubic meter, which is approximately 200 times the PEL. The exposure was derived from a sample taken from a 313 minute period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 167 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2240
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.62 D01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2014
Abate by
Dec 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,240 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA).  On or about 8-6-14, at a residence in New Orleans, LA, the employer allowed employees to sand lead based paint off the exterior wood siding of the residence without determining what the lead exposure would be for the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2240
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339891848.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.