TAMPA, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: RAINMAKER IRRIGATION & LANDSCAPING INC.
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of RAINMAKER IRRIGATION & LANDSCAPING INC. in NEW TAMPA BOULEVARD, TAMPA, FL 33647 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 339893778.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RAINMAKER IRRIGATION & LANDSCAPING INC.
- Site address
- NEW TAMPA BOULEVARD
- City
- TAMPA
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33647
- Mailing
- 334 EAST LAKE ROAD, SUITE 215, PALM HARBOR, FL 34685
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561730
- Employees
- 47
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.67 C02 IV
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(iv): 29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(iv): The employer did not ensure employee(s) stand firmly on the floor of the basket and do not sit or climb on the edge of the basket or use planks, ladders, or other devices for a work position. (A) At New Tampa Boulevard an employee was observed standing on the toe guard of an aerial lift while pruning palms and exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 30 feet on or about 08/11/2014.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2940
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.67 C02 V
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: (A) At New Tampa Boulevard an employee pruning palms while on an aerial lift had no fall protection and exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 30 feet on or about 08/11/2014.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: (a)At New Tampa Boulevard an employee pruning palms using a chain saw while on an aerial lift had no pants or chaps that contain pads of cut retardant material to reduce the risk of cut injuries on or about 08/11/2014. .
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2520
- · Z (S) $4200
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: (a)At New Tampa Boulevard an employee pruning palms using a chain saw while on an aerial lift had no face protection on or about 08/11/2014.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): (a)At New Tampa Boulevard a workplace hazard assessment was not performed on or about 08/11/2014.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: (a)At New Tampa Boulevard, the noise levels while an employee was pruning palms using a chain saw were not assessed on or about 08/11/2014.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561730)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339893778.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.