Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARE ISLAND DRY DOCK

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARE ISLAND DRY DOCK in 1180 NIMITZ AVE., VALLEJO, CA 94592 (NAICS 336611). OSHA activity number 339894610.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mare Island DRY Dock — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mare Island DRY Dock is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1180 NIMITZ AVE.
City
VALLEJO
State
CA
ZIP
94592
Mailing
1180 NIMITZ AVE., VALLEJO, CA 94592
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336611
Employees
75
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1915.12 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2014
Abate by
Nov 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,575 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.12(d)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee entering a confined or enclosed space or other areas with dangerous atmospheres was trained to perform all required duties safely:   Onboard USCG CUTTER POLAR STAR, rudder trunk, 4-251-T: An outside machinist was working inside the trunk and had not received training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1575
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2014
Abate by
Nov 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,575 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was required to use the respirator in the workplace (Reference 29 CFR 1915.154 for shipyard employment):     Mare Island Dry-Dock, bottom of dry-dock number two: Three laborers were required by the foremen to wear N95 respirators while sweeping and shoveling debris from the dry-dock floor and they had not been medically evaluated to determine their ability to use the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1575
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2014
Abate by
Nov 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (Reference 29 CFR 1915.154 for shipyard employment):   Mare Island Dry-Dock, bottom of dry-dock number two: Three laborers were required by the foremen to wear N95 respirators while sweeping and shoveling debris from the dry-dock floor and they had not  been fit tested prior to using the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Mare Island DRY Dock's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339894610.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.