NEW YORK, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: SETANTA RESTORATION INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SETANTA RESTORATION INC. in 16 MORTON ST, NEW YORK, NY 10014 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 339899346.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SETANTA RESTORATION INC.
- Site address
- 16 MORTON ST
- City
- NEW YORK
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10014
- Mailing
- 32 DOUGLAS AVE, YONKERS, NY 10703
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 A02
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(a)(2): The employer did not determine if the walking/working surfaces on which its employees were to work on, had the strength and structure integrity to support employees safely: Location: 16 Morton Street NY, NY / 3rd floor On or about: August 14, 2014 a) Workers were working from a surface that was part of the demolished stairwell system. As the employees were hoisting up a beam, the working surface collapsed and the employees were injured.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.855 D
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.855(d): Stringers of ample strength were not installed to support the flooring planks, and the ends of such stringers were not supported by floor beams or girders, and not by floor arches alone. Location: 16 Morton Street NY, NY / 3rd floor On or about: August 14, 2014 a) Employees were manually hoisting materials while standing on a beam with a single piece of plywood placed on top of a partially demolished stairwell system. The work surface collapsed as employees were working on it.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Location: 16 Morton Street NY, NY / 3rd floor On or about: August 14, 2014 a) Employees were not trained in the recognition of fall hazards and procedures to eliminate or minimize the fall hazards. Two employees were working on a beam on the third floor and two more employees were on the second floor assisting the workers on the third floor, and they did not recognize fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.850 A
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.850(a): An engineering survey was not performed by a competent person to determine the conditions of the framing floors and walls and the possibility of unplanned collapse of any portion of the structure prior to permitting employees to start demolition operations. Location: 16 Morton Street NY, NY / 3rd floor On or about: August 14, 2014 a) Employees conducting demolition activity did not have a competent person conduct and implement an engineering survey to complete the demolition.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Location: 16 Morton Street NY, NY / 3rd floor On or about: August 14, 2014 a) Employees were using an extension ladder to access the second floor, it did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support) Location: 16 Morton Street NY, NY / 1st floor On or about: August 14, 2014 a) Employees were utilizing an extension ladder to access the second floor of the project. The ladder was erected with the base too close to the access point.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step Location: 16 Morton Street NY, NY / 3rd floor On or about: August 14, 2014 a) Employees used the top or top step of a stepladder to climb up to the third floor.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B15
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,600 · Current $5,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(15): Each employee on a walking/working surface 6 feet (1.8 meters) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: Location: 16 Morton Street NY, NY / 3rd floor On or about: August 14, 2014 a) Employees were hoisting materials on a beam on the third floor without any guardrail system, safety net or personal fall arrest system. b) Employees were assisting with the hoisting of material while standing on a work surface on the second floor without any guardrail system, safety net or personal fall arrest system. Setanta restoration Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(15), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 940548, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 11/15/2013, with respect to a workplace located at 177 West 4 Street New York, NY 10014.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (R) $5600
More inspections at Setanta Restoration INC.
View Setanta Restoration INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339899346.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.