Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MERCURY PRODUCTS CORP.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MERCURY PRODUCTS CORP. in 1201 S. MERCURY DRIVE, SCHAUMBURG, IL 60193 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 339899817.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mercury Products Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mercury Products Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1201 S. MERCURY DRIVE
City
SCHAUMBURG
State
IL
ZIP
60193
Mailing
1201 S. MERCURY DRIVE, SCHAUMBURG, IL 60193
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332116
Employees
237
Ownership type
A

16 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 190 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Sep 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,930 · Current $3,465 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    An effective hearing conservation program which included noise monitoring, audiometric testing of employees and training of employees as detailed in the standard was not instituted by Mercury Products Corp., Schaumburg, IL.    Note: The 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA that triggers the requirement for a hearing conservation program (HCP) can be adjusted for work shifts less than or greater than 8 hours. When making the adjustment, the following formula is used: AL = 90 + 16.61log [50/12.5 (hours)].  Affected employees were exposed to continuous noise levels over a 10-hour work shift. Therefore, the TWA sound level that triggers the requirement for a HCP was adjusted or reduced for the affected employees to 83.4 dBA.    a) A Labor Network employee working in the Polishing Department at Mercury Products Corp., Schaumburg, IL, was exposed to continuous noise levels at 131% of the allowable OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 131% is approximately 91.9 dBA, which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 322 minutes during one 10-hour shift on October 9, 2014. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 278 minutes.    b) A Labor Network employee working in the Polishing Department at Mercury Products Corp., Schaumburg, IL, was exposed to continuous noise levels at 163.1% of the allowable OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average sound level   (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 163.1% is approximately 93.5 dBA, which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 574 minutes during one 10-hour shift on October 9, 2014. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 26 minutes.    c) A Mercury employee operating the "Man buff" operation in the Polishing Department was exposed to continuous noise levels  at 70.1% of the allowable OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 70.1% is approximately 87.4 dBA, which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 502 minutes during one 10-hour shift on October 9, 2014.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 98 minutes.    d) A Mercury employee in Finishing/Packing outside of the Polishing  Department was exposed to continuous noise levels at 69.3% of the allowable OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 69.3% is approximately 87.4 dBA, which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 520 minutes during one 10-hour shift on October 9, 2014. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 80 minutes.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3465
  • — C (S) $6930
  • — Z (S) $6930

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 190 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Sep 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,930 · Current $3,465 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:    Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not develop and implement a noise monitoring program covering all workers at their worksite when any employee's noise exposure was indicated to be at or above the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.    Note: The 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA that triggers the requirement for a hearing conservation program (HCP) can be adjusted for work shifts less than or greater than 8 hours. When making the adjustment, the following formula is used: AL = 90 + 16.61log [50/12.5 (hours)].  Affected employees were exposed to continuous noise levels over a 10-hour work shift. Therefore, the TWA sound level that triggers the requirement for a HCP was adjusted or reduced for the affected employees to 83.4 dBA.    a) A Labor Network employee working in the Polishing Department at Mercury Products Corp., Schaumburg, IL, was exposed to continuous noise levels at 131% of the allowable OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 131% is approximately 91.9 dBA, which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 322 minutes during one 10-hour shift on October 9, 2014. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 278 minutes.    b) A Labor Network employee working in the Polishing Department at Mercury Products Corp., Schaumburg, IL, was exposed to continuous noise levels at 163.1% of the allowable OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average sound level   (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 163.1% is approximately 93.5 dBA, which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 574 minutes during one 10-hour shift on October 9, 2014. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 26 minutes.    c) A Mercury employee operating the "Man buff" operation in the Polishing Department was exposed to continuous noise levels  at 70.1% of the allowable OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 70.1% is approximately 87.4 dBA, which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 502 minutes during one 10-hour shift on October 9, 2014.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 98 minutes.    d) A Mercury employee in Finishing/Packing outside of the Polishing  Department was exposed to continuous noise levels at 69.3% of the allowable OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 69.3% is approximately 87.4 dBA, which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 520 minutes during one 10-hour shift on October 9, 2014. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 80 minutes.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3465
  • — C (S) $6930
  • — Z (S) $6930

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 190 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Sep 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,930 · Current $3,465 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:    Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not establish and maintain a complete and adequate audiometric testing program making audiometric testing available to all workers, including contracted workers from temporary staffing agencies, who worked alongside Mercury employees, and whose noise exposure levels equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA:     Note: The 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA that triggers the requirement for a hearing conservation program (HCP) can be adjusted for work shifts less than or greater than 8 hours. When making the adjustment, the following formula is used: AL = 90 + 16.61log [50/12.5 (hours)].  Affected employees were exposed to continuous noise levels over a 10-hour work shift. Therefore, the TWA sound level that triggers the requirement for a HCP was adjusted or reduced for the affected employees to 83.4 dBA.    a) A Labor Network employee working in the Polishing Department at Mercury Products Corp., Schaumburg, IL, was exposed to continuous noise levels at 131% of the allowable OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 131% is approximately 91.9 dBA, which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 322 minutes during one 10-hour shift on October 9, 2014. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 278 minutes.    b) A Labor Network employee working in the Polishing Department at Mercury Products Corp., Schaumburg, IL, was exposed to continuous noise levels at 163.1% of the allowable OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average sound level   (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 163.1% is approximately 93.5 dBA, which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 574 minutes during one 10-hour shift on October 9, 2014. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 26 minutes.    c) A Mercury employee operating the "Man buff" operation in the Polishing Department was exposed to continuous noise levels  at 70.1% of the allowable OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 70.1% is approximately 87.4 dBA, which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 502 minutes during one 10-hour shift on October 9, 2014.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 98 minutes.    d) A Mercury employee in Finishing/Packing outside of the Polishing  Department was exposed to continuous noise levels at 69.3% of the allowable OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 69.3% is approximately 87.4 dBA, which exceeds the adjusted action level of 83.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 520 minutes during one 10-hour shift on October 9, 2014. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 80 minutes.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3465
  • — C (S) $6930
  • — Z (S) $6930

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Sep 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,970 · Current $1,485 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0685152016209135C113

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a) Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not establish and implement a respiratory protection program for employees required to wear respiratory protection, such as the Moldex brand model(s) 2300 and black 2600 N95-rated particulate respirators, in the Polishing Department.        The respiratory protection program must be administered by a suitably trained program administrator and shall include, at a minimum, procedures for selecting respirators; medical evaluations; fit testing; procedures for proper use in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations; procedures for cleaning, storing, inspecting, repairing and discarding respirators; employee training regarding respiratory hazards they are exposed to, proper uses and limitations of respirators; and procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the respirator program.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1485
  • — C (S) $2970
  • — Z (S) $2970

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Sep 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,970 · Current $1,485 Reduced

Hazardous substances 06850690152016209135

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a) Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not provide a medical evaluation to workers required to wear respiratory protection, such as the Moldex brand model(s) 2300 and black 2600 N95-rated particulate respirators, in the Polishing Department.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1485
  • — C (S) $2970
  • — Z (S) $2970

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Sep 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,970 · Current $1,485 Reduced

Hazardous substances 06850690152016209135

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    a) Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not provide fit tests to workers required to wear respiratory protection, such as the Moldex brand model(s) 2300 and black 2600 N95-rated particulate respirators, in the Polishing Department.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1485
  • — C (S) $2970
  • — Z (S) $2970

1910.1026 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Sep 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,950 · Current $2,180 Reduced

Hazardous substances 06850691

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI). The employer is to make this determination in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2), the scheduled monitoring option, or paragraph (d)(3), the performance-oriented option.    Mercury Products, Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not initially determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure levels for employees exposed to hexavalent chromium during processing or tasks performed on stainless steel, such as welding.     a) On October 9, 2014, a Mercury Products, Corp. employee conducting MIG welding on stainless steel parts was determined to have an 8-hour time-weighted average exposure level to hexavalent chromium of 0.0008 mg/M3 during the 406-minute sampling period, exceeding the criterion limit of 0.0005 mg/M3 which triggers the requirement for initial monitoring. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 74 minutes.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2180
  • — C (S) $4950
  • — Z (S) $4950

1910.1026 L01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 32 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Sep 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,970 · Current $1,485 Reduced

Hazardous substances 06850691

29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1): The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to chromium (VI) were provided with information and training as required by the Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200:    a) Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL did not provide the required information and training on the hazards of hexavalent chromium to affected employees, including MIG welders and polishers.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1485
  • — C (S) $2970
  • — Z (S) $2970

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 190 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 00400430043506851040

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not provide effective information and training to employees, including contract workers, exposed to hazardous chemicals including, 100% acetone when used as a solvent/cleaner, 1st Ayd heavy duty degreaser (contains 2-butoxyethanol, n-butane, isopropyl alcohol and propane), Sunnyside denatured alcohol solvent (contains ethyl acetate, methyl isobutyl ketone, ethyl alcohol, methyl alcohol, and light aliphatic naphtha) for cleaning metals parts.  Employees in polishing and finishing were exposed to Hubercarb calcium carbonate (limestone powder), which contains up to 2% crystalline quartz silica.  Press operators and set-up men were exposed to lube oils, such as WD-40.  MIG welders were exposed to welding gases, such as nitrogen, in addition to welding fumes (which contained manganese, nickel, iron oxide and chromium. Polishers were exposed to metal particulates including manganese and chromium.                   In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 190 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Sep 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,970 · Current $1,485 Reduced

Hazardous substances 00400430043506850691

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) Mercury Products, Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not develop or implement a complete and effective written hazard communication program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) that would at least describe how the following program elements would be met:    1) Labeling requirements for the containers/packages of the hazardous chemicals, including in-plant secondary containers;  2) Maintenance and availability of safety data sheets (SDSs);    3) Employee/worker training on the hazardous chemicals they use or are exposed to in their workplace;   4) A complete and accurate list or inventory of the hazardous chemicals known to be in the workplace that can be cross-referenced with the required safety data sheets (SDSs);    5) Methods to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks, and    6) Methods to inform other employers/contractors of SDS availability, labeling system and any other precautionary measures to protect employees.      Mercury Products Corp. and contract employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals including, 100% acetone when used as a solvent/cleaner, 1st Ayd heavy duty degreaser (contains 2-butoxyethanol, n-butane, isopropyl alcohol and propane), Sunnyside denatured alcohol solvent (contains ethyl acetate, methyl isobutyl ketone, ethyl alcohol, methyl alcohol, and light aliphatic naphtha) for cleaning metals parts.  Employees in polishing and finishing were exposed to Hubercarb calcium carbonate (limestone powder), which contains up to 2% crystalline quartz silica.  Press operators and set-up men were exposed to lube oils, such as WD-40.  MIG welders were exposed to welding gases, such as nitrogen, in addition to welding fumes (that contained manganese, nickel, iron oxide and chromium). Polishers were exposed to metal particulates including manganese and chromium.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1485
  • — C (S) $2970
  • — Z (S) $2970

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 190 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 00400430043506851040

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile and maintain a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet:  a) Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not provide as part of their Hazard Communication Plan a master list or inventory of all the hazardous chemicals known to be present in the work place using a product identifier that is cross-referenced with the appropriate safety data sheet.  Mercury Products Corp. and contract employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals including, 100% acetone when used as a solvent/cleaner, 1st Ayd heavy duty degreaser (contains 2-butoxyethanol, n-butane, isopropyl alcohol and propane), Sunnyside denatured alcohol solvent (contains ethyl acetate, methyl isobutyl ketone, ethyl alcohol, methyl alcohol, and light aliphatic naphtha) for cleaning metals parts.  Employees in polishing and finishing were exposed to Hubercarb calcium carbonate (limestone powder) containing up to 2% crystalline quartz silica.  Press operators and set-up men were exposed to lube oils, such as WD-40.  MIG welders were exposed to welding gases, such as nitrogen, in addition to welding fumes (containing manganese, iron oxide, nickel and chromium). Polishers were exposed to metal particulates including manganese and chromium.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 06850691152016201840

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  a) Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not provide welders voluntarily using Moldex 2300 N95 and black Moldex 2600 N95 filtering facepiece respirators with the information contained in Appendix D of the respiratory protection standard.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 190 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Feb 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0435156020372150

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:  Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not ensure that the portable containers found in various departments and used by multiple departmental employees throughout different shifts, were labeled with the identity of the chemical in the container(s).  a) A spray bottle of lube oil used on the presses in the Brackets department was not labeled with the identity of its contents.  b) On a work table in the Finishing area adjacent to the Polishing department, a "Zep" spray bottle identified as containing "1st Ayd 1971 solvent" containing 2-butoxyethanol, n-butane, isopropyl alcohol and propane, applied on metal parts to clean before packing, was not labeled with the identity of its contents.   In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 190 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Feb 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0435156020372150

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not ensure that the portable containers found in various departments and used by multiple departmental employees throughout different shifts, were labeled with the appropriate hazard warnings.  a) A spray bottle of lube oil used on the presses in the Brackets department was not labeled with the appropriate hazard warnings.  b) On a work table in the Finishing area adjacent to the Polishing department, a "Zep" spray bottle identified as containing "1st Ayd 1971 solvent" containing 2-butoxyethanol, n-butane, isopropyl alcohol and propane, applied on metal parts to clean before packing, was not labeled with the appropriate hazard warnings.   In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 190 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 04300435068506911040

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):   a) Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL, did not maintain readily available and accessible for all workers at the job site the required safety data sheets (SDSs) for each hazardous chemical used in the workplace, such 100% acetone, 1st Ayd heavy duty degreaser (contains 2-butoxyethanol, n-butane, isopropyl alcohol and propane), Sunnyside denatured alcohol solvent (contains ethyl acetate, methyl isobutyl ketone, ethyl alcohol, methyl alcohol, and light aliphatic naphtha), Hubercarb calcium carbonate (limestone powder) that contains up to 2% crystalline quartz silica), WD-40, nitrogen gas, and polishing compounds such as BC 22 containing calcined alumina and chrome oxide.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 190 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a) Mercury Products Corp. in Schaumburg, IL has not provided the required training on the revised Hazard Communication Standard label elements (e.g., pictograms and signal words) and the new format of the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) (i.e., section order and types of information contained within each section of the SDS), which was effective as of December 1, 2013, to workers handling or using chemicals including workers using 100% acetone; 1st Ayd heavy duty degreaser containing 2-butoxyethanol, n-butane, isopropyl alcohol and propane; Sunnyside denatured alcohol solvent containing ethyl acetate, methyl isobutyl ketone, ethyl alcohol, methyl alcohol and light aliphatic naphtha for cleaning metals parts; Hubercarb calcium carbonate (with limestone powder containing up to 2% crystalline quartz silica) used in the polishing and finishing departments; Lube oils such as WD-40 for the presses; nitrogen gas used in welding, and polishing compounds, such as, BC 22 containing calcined alumina and chrome oxide.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Mercury Products Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339899817.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.