ANDOVER, KS ·
OSHA Inspection: RAFAEL MENJIVAL
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RAFAEL MENJIVAL in 735 BRADENTON ST, ANDOVER, KS 67002 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339899916.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RAFAEL MENJIVAL
- Site address
- 735 BRADENTON ST
- City
- ANDOVER
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 67002
- Mailing
- 905 SE THIRD, NEWTON, KS 67114
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $204 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, was not protected by protective helmets. The employer did not require the employee working on the ground beneath the roofer to wear a hard hat. The employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $204
- · Z (S) $1020
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $340 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): The employer did not ensure the employees performing roofing operations on the 8/12 pitch roof were protected from falling. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately eleven (11) feet from eave to ground.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $340
- · Z (S) $1700
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $204 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to upper landing surfaces, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladders were used to gain access. The employer did not ensure that the ladder extended more than one rung (approximately 1.5 feet) above the eave of the roof. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of up to approximately eleven (11) feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $204
- · Z (S) $1020
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in KS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339899916.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.