Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: RAFAEL MENJIVAL

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RAFAEL MENJIVAL in 735 BRADENTON ST, ANDOVER, KS 67002 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339899916.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rafael Menjival for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rafael Menjival is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RAFAEL MENJIVAL
Site address
735 BRADENTON ST
City
ANDOVER
State
KS
ZIP
67002
Mailing
905 SE THIRD, NEWTON, KS 67114
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $204 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, was not protected by protective helmets.  The employer did not require the employee working on the ground beneath the roofer to wear a hard hat. The employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $204
  • · Z (S) $1020

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $340 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   The employer did not ensure the employees performing roofing operations on the 8/12 pitch roof were protected from falling. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately eleven (11) feet from eave to ground.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $340
  • · Z (S) $1700

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $204 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to upper landing surfaces, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladders were used to gain access.  The employer did not ensure that the ladder extended more than one rung (approximately 1.5 feet) above the eave of the roof. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of up to approximately eleven (11) feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $204
  • · Z (S) $1020

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339899916.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.