OSHA Inspection: PRO ARMAMENT COMPANY LLC.

Issued

Jun 18, 2015

Abate by

Aug 5, 2015

Penalty

Initial $400 · Current $400

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  On or about June 18, 2015, the employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Items 1-1a, 1-1b, 1-1c, 1-1d, 1-2b, 1-2c, 1-2d, and 1-2e for hazards associated with:  (a)      Lack of respiratory protection program;  (b)      Lack of respirator medical evaluations;  (c)      Lack of respirator fit testing;  (d)      Lack of respirator training;  (e)      Surfaces not maintained as free as practicable from lead accumulations  (f)       Dry sweeping lead dust;  (g)      Lack of training on hazards associated with lead; and,  (h)      Lack of hazard communication program.

Issued

Oct 14, 2014

Abate by

Mar 18, 2015

Penalty

Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    On or about August 15, 2014, employees were required to wear respiratory protection while cleaning the shooting range. The company did not have a written respiratory protection program.

Issued

Oct 14, 2014

Abate by

Mar 18, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    On or about August 15, 2014, employees were required to wear respiratory protection while cleaning the shooting range and had not first received a medical evaluation.

Issued

Oct 14, 2014

Abate by

Dec 31, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    On or about August 15, 2014, employees were required to wear respiratory protection while cleaning the shooting range and had not first received a fit test.

Issued

Oct 14, 2014

Abate by

Mar 18, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1):  The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii):    On or about August 15, 2014, employees were required to wear respiratory protection while cleaning the shooting range. Employees have not received respiratory protection training in accordance with the standard.

Issued

Oct 14, 2014

Penalty

Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced

Hazardous substances 15911592

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level:    On or about August 15, 2014, the employer did not do an initial determination to determine if employees were exposed at or above the action level for lead when cleaning up the gun range.

Issued

Oct 14, 2014

Abate by

Mar 18, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 15911592

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead:    On or about August 15, wipe samples were taken from surfaces in the gun range and cash register area. Analytical results indicated the presence of lead, as follows:      a) Cash Register: 225.8 ug/ft2    b) Water Fountain in Range Area: 537.5 ug/ft2     c) Table in Range Area: 1057.8 ug/ft2    Surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable from accumulations of lead.

Issued

Oct 14, 2014

Abate by

Mar 18, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 15911592

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(3): Vacuums were not used and/or emptied in a manner which minimized the reentry of lead into the workplace:    On or about August 15, 2014, employees were dry sweeping lead dust into pans instead of using a HEPA-filter vacuum.

Issued

Oct 14, 2014

Abate by

Mar 18, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 15911592

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not train each employee who is subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1025:    On or about August 15, 2014, company employees were exposed to lead while cleaning the shooting range, working in the store, and using the break room. Employees have not received training on the hazards of lead.

Issued

Oct 14, 2014

Abate by

Mar 18, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 15911592

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(1)(i): The employer did not comply with all of the requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (� 1910.1200) for lead:    On or about August 15, 2014, the employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program that included the hazards associated with lead for employees exposed to lead when cleaning the gun range.