Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KING KONGE CONSTRUCTION LLC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other health inspection of KING KONGE CONSTRUCTION LLC in E CORNER OF DELAWARE AND TUPPER, BUFFALO, NY 14202 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 339902793.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch King Konge Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for King Konge Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
E CORNER OF DELAWARE AND TUPPER
City
BUFFALO
State
NY
ZIP
14202
Mailing
295 MAIN STREET #801, BUFFALO, NY 14203
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238190
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2014
Abate by
Oct 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: (Construction Reference 1926.103)  a) NE corner of Delaware and W Tupper - On or about 8/15/14, employees were dry, saw cutting silica-containing concrete (30% silica by weight).  The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards, such as dust containing silica.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2014
Abate by
Oct 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  a.) Delaware and W Tupper Avenues - On or about 8/15/14, an employee was observed operating a powered industrial truck, after lifting saw-cut sidewalks.  The employee was observed operating the forklift with forks raised; did not sound his horn at locations where vision was obstructed, such as when entering traffic; and, traveling at excessive speed.  The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2014
Abate by
Oct 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  a.) NE Corner of Delaware Avenue and W Tupper/Facility - On or about 8/15/14, an employees operating a Bobcat S300 powered Industrial truck to remove and lift saw cut sidewalk sections, was observed operating the vehicle with forks lifted; at excessive speeds; and without honking the horn at intersections.  The employer did not provide an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator at least once every three years.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2014
Abate by
Oct 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  a.) NE Corner of Delaware and W Tupper - On or about 8/15/14, an employee was observed operating an S300 Bobcat powered industrial truck.  The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION RFEQUIRED
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2014
Abate by
Oct 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  a) NE Corner of Delaware and W Tupper Streets, on or about 8/15/14, employees are exposed to silica containing dust while performing dry saw cutting of concrete.  The employer has not developed, implemented, and/or maintained at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specific in (f, (g), and (h) will be met.   A written program should include descriptions of the criteria for:      1.) Labeling and other forms of warning;     2.) Safety data Sheets, AND;     3.) Employee information and Training will be met.  Additionally, a list of hazardous chemical know to be present in the workplace must be compiled.  methods used to inform employees of the hazards associated with non-routine task and the informing of contractors of workplace hazard must also be addressed.  The written program must be made available upon request.  ASBATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2014
Abate by
Oct 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  a.) NE Corner of Delaware and W Tupper - On or about 8/15/14, employees were observed dry saw cutting concrete, exposing the employees to concrete dust that contained 30% silica by weight.  The employer did not maintain copies the required of Safety Data Sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace.  No Safety data Sheets were maintained by the employer or available to the employees at the worksite.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2014
Abate by
Oct 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  a.) Corner of Delaware and W. Tupper, on or about 8/15/14 - Employees were observed dry cutting concrete sidewalks creating silica-containing dust, to which the employees were exposed without the benefit of engineering and/or work practice controls and/or personal protective equipment.  The employer had not provided employees effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A02

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2014
Abate by
Sep 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): Eye and face protective equipment being used did not used meet the requirements specified in Z 87.1-1968.  a)  NE Corner Delaware and W Tupper - On or about 8/15/14, employees observed dry saw cutting concrete were not wearing eye and face protection that met the requirements specified in Z 87.1-1968.  An employee was observed using a Stihl saw to cut the concrete without any eye protection.  b.)  NE Corner Delaware and W Tupper - On or about 8/15/14, employees observed dry saw cutting concrete were not wearing eye and face protection that met the requirements specified in Z 87.1-1968.  An employee was observed using a Stihl saw to cut the concrete with non-ANSI-approved sunglasses.  c.)  NE Corner Delaware and W Tupper - On or about 8/15/14, employees observed dry saw cutting concrete were not wearing eye and face protection that met the requirements specified in Z 87.1-1968.  An employee was observed using a Stihl saw to cut the concrete with non-ANSI-approved glasses without side shield protection.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

View King Konge Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339902793.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.