AKRON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: MK PAINTING, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MK PAINTING, INC. in MONTROSE TOWER, 100 HUNT CLUB DRIVE, AKRON, OH 44321 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 339903155.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MK PAINTING, INC.
- Site address
- MONTROSE TOWER, 100 HUNT CLUB DRIVE
- City
- AKRON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44321
- Mailing
- 4157 7TH STREET, WYANDOTTE, MI 48192
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
16 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1018 C
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(c): The employer did not ensure that no employee is exposed to inorganic arsenic at concentrations greater than ten micrograms per cubic meter of air (10 µg/m3) average over an 8-hour period: On or about August 26, 2014, a worker performing abrasive blasting operations on a water tower was exposed to arsenic at a time weighted average (TWA) of 14 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/M3) which is approximately 1.4 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 10 µg/M3, for the 467 minutes sampled. Zero exposure is assumed for time not sampled.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1018 E02
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(e)(2): The employer whose workplace operation is covered by this standard did not monitor each such workplace and work operation to accurately determine the airborne concentration of inorganic arsenic to which employees may be exposed: On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not conduct initial exposure monitoring at the water tower site who were found to be exposed to inorganic arsenic including, but not limited to the following workers: a. An abrasive blast operator was exposed to inorganic arsenic at a TWA of 0.014 mg/M3 for 467 minutes. Zero exposure assumed for the time not sampled. b. An abrasive blast operator was exposed to inorganic arsenic at a TWA of 0.0053 mg/M3 for 467 minutes. Zero exposure assumed for the time not sampled. c. A groundsman was exposed to inorganic arsenic at a TWA of 0.0039 mg/M3 for 455 minutes. Zero exposure assumed for the time not sampled.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1018 M01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(m)(1): The employer did not provide for employees subject to the possibility of skin or eye irritation from inorganic arsenic clean change rooms equipped with storage facilities for street clothes and separate storage facilities for protective clothing and equipment in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.141(e): On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not have clean change rooms for the worker(s) in and around the abrasive blasting/containment area who were exposed to airborne levels of inorganic arsenic as discussed in Cit. 1, item 1(a) and item 1(b).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1018 M02
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(m)(2): The employer did not assure that employees working in regulated areas or subject to the possibility of skin or eye irritation from inorganic arsenic shower at the end of the work shift: On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not provide shower facilities for the worker(s) in and around the abrasive blasting/containment area who were exposed to airborne levels of inorganic arsenic as discussed in Cit. 1, item 1(a) and item 1(b).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1018 M03 II
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(m)(3)(ii): The employer did not assure that employees working in regulated areas or subject to the possibility of skin or eye irritation from inorganic arsenic wash their hands and face prior to eating: On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not provide hand washing facilities for the worker(s) in and around the abrasive blasting/containment area who were exposed to airborne levels of inorganic arsenic as discussed in Cit. 1, item 1(a) and item 1(b).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1018 N02
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(n)(2): For employees initially covered by the medical provisions of this section or thereafter at the time of initial assignment to an area where the employee is likely to be exposed over the action level at least 30 days per year the employer did not provide each affected employee an opportunity for a medical evaluation: On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not provide the required medical evaluation for the worker(s) in and around the abrasive blasting/containment area who were exposed to airborne levels of inorganic arsenic as discussed in Cit. 1, item 1(a) and item 1(b).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1018 O01 I
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(o)(1)(i): The employer had not trained each employee who is subject to exposure to inorganic arsenic above the action level or for whom there is the possibility of skin or eye irritation from inorganic arsenic, in accordance with the requirements of this section: On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not provide the required training for the worker(s) in and around the abrasive blasting/containment area who were exposed to airborne levels of inorganic arsenic as discussed in Cit. 1, item 1(a) and item 1(b).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1018 P02 I
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1018(p)(2)(i): The employer did not post signs demarcating regulated areas bearing the language per standard requirements: On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not post the signage as required by the standard for the worker(s) in and around the abrasive blasting/containment area who were exposed to airborne levels of inorganic arsenic as discussed in Cit. 1, item 1(a) and item 1(b).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 C01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(c)(1): The employer did not ensure that no employee is exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air (50 µg/m3) average over an 8-hour period: On or about August 26, 2014, a worker performing abrasive blasting operations on a water tower was exposed to lead at a time weighted average (TWA) of 61 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/M3) which is approximately 1.22 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 µg/M3, for the 467 minutes sampled. Zero exposure assumed for time not sampled.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1500
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.62 D01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1): The employer whose workplace operation is covered by this standard did not initially determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not conduct initial exposure monitoring at the water tower site who were found to be exposed to lead above the time weighted average (TWA) action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/M3) including, but not limited to the following workers: a. An abrasive blast operator was exposed to lead at a TWA of 38 µg/M3 for 467 minutes. Zero exposure assumed for the time not sampled. b. An abrasive blast operator was exposed to lead at a TWA of 61 µg/M3 for 467 minutes. Zero exposure assumed for the time not sampled. c. A groundsman was exposed to lead at a TWA of 34 µg/M3 for 455 minutes. Zero exposure assumed for the time not sampled.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 I01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(1): The employer did not assure that areas where employees are exposed to lead above the PEL without regard to the use of respirators food or beverage is not present or consumed: On or about August 26, 2014, the employer allowed employees to consume beverages and food in the area(s) that were over the PEL, in particular those discussed in Cit. 1, item 2(a) and 2(b). Workers were observed drinking beverages and eating consumables near or around the grit pots/compressed air supply trailer.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 I02
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2): The employer did not provide clean change areas for employees whose airborne exposure to lead above the PEL, and as an interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of this section: On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not have clean change rooms for the worker(s) in and around the abrasive blasting area, and for at least the worker overexposure discussed in Cit. 1, item 2(a) and 2(b).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 I03
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(3): The employer did not provide shower areas, where feasible, for use by employees whose airborne exposure to lead is above the PEL: On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not have shower areas for the worker(s) overexposed to lead in the abrasive blasting area, as discussed in Cit. 1, item 2(a) and 2(b).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 I05
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5): The employer did not provide adequate handwashing facilities for use by employees exposed to lead in accordance to 1926.51(f): On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not have the handwashing facilities for the worker(s) exposed to lead in the abrasive blasting area as discussed in citation 1, item 2(a) and item 2(b).
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 J01 I
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(j)(1)(i): The employer did not make available initial medical surveillance to employees occupationally exposed on any day to lead at or above the action level: On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not provide the initial medical surveillance to workers exposed at or above the action level as discussed in Cit. 1, item 2(a) and 2(b).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 M01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(m)(1): The employer did not post the required warning signs in each area where an employee's exposure to lead is above the PEL: On or about August 26, 2014, the employer did not post the warning signs as required in the work area where the workers are exposed to lead above the PEL, as discussed in Cit. 1, item 2(a) and 2(b).
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at MK Painting, INC.
View MK Painting, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339903155.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.