Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ACKERMAN

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ACKERMAN in 300 MILL ST., CURTICE, OH 43412 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 339907206.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ackerman for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ackerman is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ACKERMAN
Site address
300 MILL ST.
City
CURTICE
State
OH
ZIP
43412
Mailing
300 MILL STREET P.O. BOX 157, CURTICE, OH 43412
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811310
Employees
24
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1001 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2014
Abate by
Dec 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(2)(i): Each employer did not perform initial monitoring of employees who were, or could reasonably be expected to be exposed to airborne concentrations at or above the action level and/or excursion limits:    a) Ackerman located in Curtice, Ohio; On or about August 13, 2014 the employer failed to conduct monitoring of employees who were exposed to class II asbestos work during the repair of the warehouse roof by M.J. Weis Roofing Co., LTD. Employees were exposed to hazards from asbestos, including asbestosis and lung cancer. Laboratory analysis indicated the material contained 29% chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1001 J01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2014
Abate by
Dec 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(1)(iii): Employers did not include asbestos in the hazard communication program established to comply with the HCS (� 1910.1200). Employers did not ensure that each employee has access to labels on containers of asbestos and to safety data sheets, and is trained in accordance with the requirements of HCS and paragraph (j)(7) of this section.    a) Ackerman located in Curtice, Ohio; On or about August 13, 2014 the employer failed to include asbestos in the hazard communication program. Employees were exposed to asbestos during class II asbestos work on the  warehouse roof by M.J. Weis Roofing Co., LTD. Employees were not trained on the hazards associated with asbestos exposure and protective measures. Laboratory analysis indicated the material contained 29% chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1001 J03 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2014
Abate by
Dec 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(3)(i): The building owner, facility owner, or employer did not determine the presence, location, and quantity of ACM or PACM at the worksite and did not exercise due diligence in complying with these requirements to inform employers and employees about the presence and location of asbestos-containing material (ACM) and presumed asbestos containing material (PACM):    a)  On or about August 13, 2014 the employer failed to determine the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing material located within the building. Employees were not made aware of the presence and location of asbestos containing material during class II asbestos work on the warehouse roof.       b)  On or about August 13, 2014 the employer failed to determine the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing material located within the building. M.J. Weis Roofing Company was not made aware of the presence and location of asbestos containing material during class II asbestos work on the warehouse roof.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339907206.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.